TSTP Solution File: COM016+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : COM016+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:42:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.65s 0.83s
% Output : Refutation 0.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 11 unt; 6 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 1 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
( ~ aElement0(X)
| ~ aRewritingSystem0(Y)
| ~ aElement0(Z)
| ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X,Y,Z)
| aReductOfIn0(Z,X,Y)
| aElement0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Y,Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCDef) ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ aElement0(X)
| ~ aRewritingSystem0(Y)
| ~ aElement0(Z)
| ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X,Y,Z)
| aReductOfIn0(Z,X,Y)
| aReductOfIn0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Y,Z),X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCDef) ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ aElement0(X)
| ~ aRewritingSystem0(Y)
| ~ aElement0(Z)
| ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X,Y,Z)
| aReductOfIn0(Z,X,Y)
| sdtmndtplgtdt0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Y,Z),Y,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCDef) ).
cnf(9,axiom,
( ~ aElement0(X)
| ~ aRewritingSystem0(Y)
| ~ aElement0(Z)
| sdtmndtasgtdt0(X,Y,Z)
| X != Z ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCRDef) ).
cnf(10,axiom,
( ~ aElement0(X)
| ~ aRewritingSystem0(Y)
| ~ aElement0(Z)
| sdtmndtasgtdt0(X,Y,Z)
| ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X,Y,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCRDef) ).
cnf(40,hypothesis,
aRewritingSystem0(xR),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__656) ).
cnf(43,hypothesis,
aElement0(xa),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731) ).
cnf(44,hypothesis,
aElement0(xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731) ).
cnf(49,hypothesis,
sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731_02) ).
cnf(51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElement0(X)
| ~ aReductOfIn0(X,xa,xR)
| ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(X,xR,xb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
cnf(61,plain,
sdtmndtasgtdt0(xb,xR,xb),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,44,40,44,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(68,plain,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| aElement0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb)) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,43,40,44,49]) ).
cnf(70,plain,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| aReductOfIn0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb),xa,xR) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,43,40,44,49]) ).
cnf(72,plain,
( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
| sdtmndtplgtdt0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb),xR,xb) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,43,40,44,49]) ).
cnf(76,plain,
~ aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[51,61,44]) ).
cnf(77,plain,
aElement0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[68,76]) ).
cnf(78,plain,
aReductOfIn0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb),xa,xR),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[70,76]) ).
cnf(79,plain,
sdtmndtplgtdt0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb),xR,xb),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[72,76]) ).
cnf(226,plain,
~ sdtmndtasgtdt0('SKOLEMAAAV1'(xa,xR,xb),xR,xb),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[51,78,77]) ).
cnf(230,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,79,77,40,44]),226]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COM016+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 19:12:38 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T19:12:38
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n009.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T19:12:38
% 0.65/0.83
% 0.65/0.83
% 0.65/0.83 #||
% 0.65/0.83 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.65/0.83 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.65/0.83 ||#
% 0.65/0.83
% 0.65/0.83 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.65/0.83 ; 405 formulas have been input or derived (from 79 formulas).
% 0.65/0.83 ; 230 (57%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.65/0.83 ; 4 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.65/0.83 ; 226 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.65/0.83 ;
% 0.65/0.83 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.006 2% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.002 1% Assert (20 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.010 3% Process new row (320 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.295 83% Resolution (156 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (78 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (3 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.001 0% Condensing (196 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.006 2% Forward subsumption (196 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.002 1% Backward subsumption (157 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.002 1% Clause clause subsumption (140 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.008 2% Forward simplification (320 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (230 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.001 0% Ordering (212 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.023 6% Other
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.357 Total
% 0.65/0.83 ; 0.361 Real time
% 0.65/0.83 ;
% 0.65/0.83 ; Term-hash-array has 238 terms in all.
% 0.65/0.83 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 153 entries (154 at peak, 157 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.65/0.83 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 525 nodes (532 at peak, 562 added, 37 deleted).
% 0.65/0.83 ; Retrieved 120 possibly forward subsuming rows in 196 calls.
% 0.65/0.83 ; Retrieved 40 possibly backward subsumed rows in 157 calls.
% 0.65/0.83 ; Path-index has 242 entries (242 at peak, 248 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.65/0.83 ; Path-index has 587 nodes (587 at peak, 593 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.65/0.83 ; Trie-index has 242 entries (242 at peak, 248 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.65/0.83 ; Trie-index has 695 nodes (695 at peak, 709 added, 14 deleted).
% 0.65/0.83 ; Retrieved 49 generalization terms in 421 calls.
% 0.65/0.83 ; Retrieved 72 instance terms in 72 calls.
% 0.65/0.83 ; Retrieved 311,941 unifiable terms in 61,628 calls.
% 0.65/0.83 ;
% 0.65/0.83 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.65/0.83 ; 1 with value 22 1 with value 24 1 with value 27
% 0.65/0.83 ; The agenda of rows to give has 147 entries:
% 0.65/0.83 ; 9 with value (4 10) 6 with value (4 15) 9 with value (4 20)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 9 with value (4 11) 53 with value (4 16) 1 with value (4 21)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 4 with value (4 12) 1 with value (4 17) 6 with value (4 22)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 6 with value (4 13) 8 with value (4 18) 4 with value (4 24)
% 0.65/0.83 ; 31 with value (4 14)
% 0.65/0.83 Evaluation took:
% 0.65/0.83 0.361 seconds of real time
% 0.65/0.83 0.348678 seconds of user run time
% 0.65/0.83 0.011997 seconds of system run time
% 0.65/0.83 [Run times include 0.009 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.65/0.83 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.65/0.83 0 page faults and
% 0.65/0.83 32,261,392 bytes consed.
% 0.65/0.83 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.65/0.83 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T19:12:38
% 0.65/0.83 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.65/0.83 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------