TSTP Solution File: COM015+4 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : COM015+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:43:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.04s 300.23s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COM015+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 17:28:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.34/3.51 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 3.34/3.51 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 3.34/3.51 Thu Jun 16 17:28:09 2022
% 3.34/3.51 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8504.
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 3.34/3.51 set(auto).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(auto1).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(process_input).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 3.34/3.51 clear(print_given).
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 formula_list(usable).
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 3.34/3.51 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 3.34/3.51 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 3.34/3.51 clauses in usable.
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(para_from).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(para_into).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 3.34/3.51 dependent: set(factor).
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 ------------> process usable:
% 3.34/3.51 809 back subsumes 679.
% 3.34/3.51 812 back subsumes 682.
% 3.34/3.51 815 back subsumes 685.
% 3.34/3.51 818 back subsumes 688.
% 3.34/3.51 821 back subsumes 691.
% 3.34/3.51 824 back subsumes 694.
% 3.34/3.51 827 back subsumes 697.
% 3.34/3.51 830 back subsumes 700.
% 3.34/3.51 833 back subsumes 703.
% 3.34/3.51 836 back subsumes 706.
% 3.34/3.51 839 back subsumes 709.
% 3.34/3.51 919 back subsumes 886.
% 3.34/3.51 922 back subsumes 889.
% 3.34/3.51 925 back subsumes 892.
% 3.34/3.51 928 back subsumes 895.
% 3.34/3.51 931 back subsumes 898.
% 3.34/3.51 934 back subsumes 901.
% 3.34/3.51 937 back subsumes 904.
% 3.34/3.51 940 back subsumes 907.
% 3.34/3.51 943 back subsumes 910.
% 3.34/3.51 946 back subsumes 913.
% 3.34/3.51 949 back subsumes 916.
% 3.34/3.51 1113 back subsumes 994.
% 3.34/3.51 1116 back subsumes 997.
% 3.34/3.51 1119 back subsumes 1000.
% 3.34/3.51 1122 back subsumes 1003.
% 3.34/3.51 1125 back subsumes 1006.
% 3.34/3.51 1128 back subsumes 1009.
% 3.34/3.51 1131 back subsumes 1012.
% 3.34/3.51 1134 back subsumes 1015.
% 3.34/3.51 1137 back subsumes 1018.
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 ------------> process sos:
% 3.34/3.51 Following clause subsumed by 1403 during input processing: 0 [copy,1403,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 3.34/3.51 1403 back subsumes 568.
% 3.34/3.51
% 3.34/3.51 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.34/3.59 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.34/3.59 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.34/3.59 number of clauses in intial UL: 1146
% 3.34/3.59 number of clauses initially in problem: 1163
% 3.34/3.59 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 98
% 3.34/3.59 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 3.34/3.59 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.34/3.59 absolute distinct symbol count: 36
% 3.34/3.59 distinct predicate count: 11
% 3.34/3.59 distinct function count: 19
% 3.34/3.59 distinct constant count: 6
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59
% 3.34/3.59 =========== start of search ===========
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Changing weight limit from 60 to 44.
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Model 3 [ 2 2 594 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Model 4 [ 1 2 7029 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 128.72/128.95
% 128.72/128.95 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 25 givens.
% 128.72/128.95
% 156.31/156.54
% 156.31/156.54
% 156.31/156.54 Changing weight limit from 44 to 40.
% 156.31/156.54
% 156.31/156.54 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 156.31/156.54
% 156.31/156.54 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 30 givens.
% 156.31/156.54
% 158.73/158.95
% 158.73/158.95
% 158.73/158.95 Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 158.73/158.95
% 158.73/158.95 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 35 givens.
% 158.73/158.95
% 181.81/182.03
% 181.81/182.03
% 181.81/182.03 Changing weight limit from 39 to 40.
% 181.81/182.03
% 181.81/182.03 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 181.81/182.03
% 181.81/182.03 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 45 givens.
% 181.81/182.03
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Changing weight limit from 40 to 41.
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Model 5 [ 6 2 5306 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Model 6 [ 4 2 6494 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Model 7 [ 2 3 9803 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 193.01/193.19
% 193.01/193.19 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 50 givens.
% 193.01/193.19
% 200.93/201.19
% 200.93/201.19
% 200.93/201.19 Changing weight limit from 41 to 42.
% 200.93/201.19
% 200.93/201.19 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 55 givens.
% 200.93/201.19
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Changing weight limit from 42 to 43.
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Model 8 [ 5 2 11428 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Model 9 [ 4 2 5671 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 211.43/211.69
% 211.43/211.69 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 60 givens.
% 211.43/211.69
% 232.94/233.17
% 232.94/233.17
% 232.94/233.17 Changing weight limit from 43 to 44.
% 232.94/233.17
% 232.94/233.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 232.94/233.17
% 232.94/233.17 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 65 givens.
% 232.94/233.17
% 300.04/300.23 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------