TSTP Solution File: COM012+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : COM012+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.37s 1.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  16 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   21 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  19   ~;  24   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (   7   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (;  10   !;   3   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdtmndtplgtdt0 > sdtmndtasgtdt0 > aReductOfIn0 > iLess0 > aRewritingSystem0 > aElement0 > #nlpp > xz > xy > xx > xR > #skF_1 > #skF_2 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(sdtmndtplgtdt0,type,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aReductOfIn0,type,
    aReductOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff(xR,type,
    xR: $i ).

tff(xy,type,
    xy: $i ).

tff(xx,type,
    xx: $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(xz,type,
    xz: $i ).

tff(aRewritingSystem0,type,
    aRewritingSystem0: $i > $o ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sdtmndtasgtdt0,type,
    sdtmndtasgtdt0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_108,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xx)
    & aRewritingSystem0(xR)
    & aElement0(xy)
    & aElement0(xz) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__349) ).

tff(f_153,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( ( xx = xy )
          | ( ( aReductOfIn0(xy,xx,xR)
              | ? [W0] :
                  ( aElement0(W0)
                  & aReductOfIn0(W0,xx,xR)
                  & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,xR,xy) ) )
            & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xy) ) )
        & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
        & ( ( xy = xz )
          | ( ( aReductOfIn0(xz,xy,xR)
              | ? [W0] :
                  ( aElement0(W0)
                  & aReductOfIn0(W0,xy,xR)
                  & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,xR,xz) ) )
            & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xy,xR,xz) ) )
        & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy,xR,xz) )
     => ( ( xx = xz )
        | aReductOfIn0(xz,xx,xR)
        | ? [W0] :
            ( aElement0(W0)
            & aReductOfIn0(W0,xx,xR)
            & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,xR,xz) )
        | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xz)
        | sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [W0,W1,W2,W3] :
      ( ( aElement0(W0)
        & aRewritingSystem0(W1)
        & aElement0(W2)
        & aElement0(W3) )
     => ( ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W2)
          & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W2,W1,W3) )
       => sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,W1,W3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCTrans) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    aElement0(xx),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_108]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xz),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
    | ( xy = xx ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_79,plain,
    xy = xx,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(xy,xR,xz)
    | ( xz = xy ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_67,plain,
    xz = xy,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_71,plain,
    ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_67,c_38]) ).

tff(c_76,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_50,c_71]) ).

tff(c_77,plain,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0(xy,xR,xz),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tff(c_80,plain,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xz),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_79,c_77]) ).

tff(c_86,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_80]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xy),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    aRewritingSystem0(xR),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_108]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    aElement0(xy),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_108]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    aElement0(xz),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_108]) ).

tff(c_246,plain,
    ! [W0_55,W1_56,W3_57,W2_58] :
      ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_55,W1_56,W3_57)
      | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(W2_58,W1_56,W3_57)
      | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_55,W1_56,W2_58)
      | ~ aElement0(W3_57)
      | ~ aElement0(W2_58)
      | ~ aRewritingSystem0(W1_56)
      | ~ aElement0(W0_55) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_256,plain,
    ! [W0_55] :
      ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_55,xR,xz)
      | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_55,xR,xy)
      | ~ aElement0(xz)
      | ~ aElement0(xy)
      | ~ aRewritingSystem0(xR)
      | ~ aElement0(W0_55) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_246]) ).

tff(c_280,plain,
    ! [W0_60] :
      ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_60,xR,xz)
      | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_60,xR,xy)
      | ~ aElement0(W0_60) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_32,c_30,c_256]) ).

tff(c_291,plain,
    ( ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
    | ~ aElement0(xx) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_280,c_40]) ).

tff(c_302,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_87,c_291]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : COM012+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:30:58 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.37/1.86  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.37/1.86  
% 3.37/1.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Inference rules
% 3.56/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.89  #Ref     : 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Sup     : 31
% 3.56/1.89  #Fact    : 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Define  : 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Split   : 5
% 3.56/1.89  #Chain   : 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Close   : 0
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Ordering : KBO
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Simplification rules
% 3.56/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.89  #Subsume      : 7
% 3.56/1.89  #Demod        : 82
% 3.56/1.89  #Tautology    : 17
% 3.56/1.89  #SimpNegUnit  : 14
% 3.56/1.89  #BackRed      : 11
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.56/1.89  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.56/1.89  
% 3.56/1.89  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.56/1.89  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.89  Preprocessing        : 0.52
% 3.56/1.89  Parsing              : 0.28
% 3.56/1.89  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.56/1.89  Main loop            : 0.32
% 3.56/1.89  Inferencing          : 0.12
% 3.56/1.89  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.56/1.89  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.56/1.89  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.56/1.89  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.56/1.89  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.56/1.89  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.56/1.89  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.56/1.89  Total                : 0.88
% 3.56/1.90  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.90  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------