TSTP Solution File: COM012+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:44:15 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 4.96s 1.53s
% Output : Proof 7.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 13:23:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.61 ________ _____
% 0.21/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.21/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.21/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.61 (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.61 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.05/1.07 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.60/1.08 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.60/1.11 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.60/1.11 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.60/1.11 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.60/1.11 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.60/1.11 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.59/1.29 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.59/1.29 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.30/1.34 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.30/1.36 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.30/1.36 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.30/1.45 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.96/1.52 Prover 2: proved (884ms)
% 4.96/1.52
% 4.96/1.53 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.96/1.53
% 4.96/1.53 Prover 3: stopped
% 4.96/1.53 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 4.96/1.54 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 4.96/1.54 Prover 6: stopped
% 5.76/1.55 Prover 5: stopped
% 5.76/1.55 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.76/1.56 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.76/1.57 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.76/1.57 Prover 0: stopped
% 5.76/1.58 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.58 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.58 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 5.76/1.58 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.61 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.61 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.76/1.61 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.61 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.53/1.64 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.53/1.65 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.53/1.65 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 10: Found proof (size 16)
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 10: proved (174ms)
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 8: stopped
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 1: stopped
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 7: stopped
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 13: stopped
% 6.92/1.72 Prover 4: stopped
% 7.22/1.78 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.22/1.78 Prover 11: stopped
% 7.22/1.78
% 7.22/1.78 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.22/1.78
% 7.22/1.79 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.22/1.79 Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.22/1.79 ---------------------------------
% 7.22/1.79
% 7.22/1.79 (mTCRDef)
% 7.22/1.80 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v0 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) |
% 7.22/1.80 ~ $i(v0) | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(v0, v1, v2) | ~ aRewritingSystem0(v1) | ~
% 7.22/1.80 aElement0(v2) | ~ aElement0(v0) | sdtmndtplgtdt0(v0, v1, v2)) & ! [v0: $i]
% 7.22/1.80 : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 7.22/1.80 sdtmndtplgtdt0(v0, v1, v2) | ~ aRewritingSystem0(v1) | ~ aElement0(v2) |
% 7.22/1.80 ~ aElement0(v0) | sdtmndtasgtdt0(v0, v1, v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 7.22/1.80 ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ aRewritingSystem0(v1) | ~ aElement0(v0) |
% 7.22/1.80 sdtmndtasgtdt0(v0, v1, v0))
% 7.22/1.80
% 7.22/1.80 (mTCTrans)
% 7.22/1.80 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2)
% 7.22/1.80 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(v2, v1, v3) | ~
% 7.22/1.80 sdtmndtplgtdt0(v0, v1, v2) | ~ aRewritingSystem0(v1) | ~ aElement0(v3) |
% 7.22/1.80 ~ aElement0(v2) | ~ aElement0(v0) | sdtmndtplgtdt0(v0, v1, v3))
% 7.22/1.80
% 7.22/1.80 (m__)
% 7.22/1.80 $i(xz) & $i(xy) & $i(xR) & $i(xx) & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy, xR, xz) &
% 7.22/1.80 sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx, xR, xy) & ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.80
% 7.22/1.80 (m__349)
% 7.22/1.80 $i(xz) & $i(xy) & $i(xR) & $i(xx) & aRewritingSystem0(xR) & aElement0(xz) &
% 7.22/1.80 aElement0(xy) & aElement0(xx)
% 7.22/1.80
% 7.22/1.80 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 7.22/1.80 --------------------------------------------
% 7.22/1.80 mElmSort, mReduct, mRelSort, mTCDef, mTCbr, mWFOrd
% 7.22/1.80
% 7.22/1.80 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 7.22/1.81 ---------------------------------
% 7.22/1.81
% 7.22/1.81 Begin of proof
% 7.22/1.81 |
% 7.22/1.81 | ALPHA: (m__) implies:
% 7.22/1.81 | (1) ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.81 | (2) sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx, xR, xy)
% 7.22/1.81 | (3) sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.81 |
% 7.22/1.81 | ALPHA: (m__349) implies:
% 7.22/1.81 | (4) aElement0(xx)
% 7.22/1.81 | (5) aElement0(xy)
% 7.22/1.81 | (6) aElement0(xz)
% 7.22/1.81 | (7) aRewritingSystem0(xR)
% 7.22/1.81 | (8) $i(xx)
% 7.22/1.81 | (9) $i(xR)
% 7.22/1.81 | (10) $i(xy)
% 7.22/1.81 | (11) $i(xz)
% 7.22/1.81 |
% 7.22/1.81 | ALPHA: (mTCRDef) implies:
% 7.22/1.81 | (12) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~
% 7.22/1.81 | $i(v0) | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(v0, v1, v2) | ~ aRewritingSystem0(v1) |
% 7.22/1.81 | ~ aElement0(v2) | ~ aElement0(v0) | sdtmndtasgtdt0(v0, v1, v2))
% 7.22/1.81 | (13) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v0 | ~ $i(v2) | ~
% 7.22/1.81 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(v0, v1, v2) | ~
% 7.22/1.81 | aRewritingSystem0(v1) | ~ aElement0(v2) | ~ aElement0(v0) |
% 7.22/1.81 | sdtmndtplgtdt0(v0, v1, v2))
% 7.22/1.81 |
% 7.22/1.81 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with xx, xR, xy, simplifying with (2), (4),
% 7.22/1.81 | (5), (7), (8), (9), (10) gives:
% 7.22/1.82 | (14) xy = xx | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx, xR, xy)
% 7.22/1.82 |
% 7.22/1.82 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with xy, xR, xz, simplifying with (3), (5),
% 7.22/1.82 | (6), (7), (9), (10), (11) gives:
% 7.22/1.82 | (15) xz = xy | sdtmndtplgtdt0(xy, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.82 |
% 7.22/1.82 | BETA: splitting (15) gives:
% 7.22/1.82 |
% 7.22/1.82 | Case 1:
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | (16) sdtmndtplgtdt0(xy, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | BETA: splitting (14) gives:
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | Case 1:
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (17) sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx, xR, xy)
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (mTCTrans) with xx, xR, xy, xz, simplifying
% 7.22/1.82 | | | with (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (16), (17)
% 7.22/1.82 | | | gives:
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (18) sdtmndtplgtdt0(xx, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with xx, xR, xz, simplifying with (1),
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (4), (6), (7), (8), (9), (11), (18) gives:
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (19) $false
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | CLOSE: (19) is inconsistent.
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | Case 2:
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (20) xy = xx
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | REDUCE: (3), (20) imply:
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (21) sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx, xR, xz)
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (21) imply:
% 7.22/1.82 | | | (22) $false
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 7.22/1.82 | | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | End of split
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | Case 2:
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | (23) xz = xy
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | REDUCE: (1), (23) imply:
% 7.22/1.82 | | (24) ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx, xR, xy)
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | PRED_UNIFY: (2), (24) imply:
% 7.22/1.82 | | (25) $false
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | | CLOSE: (25) is inconsistent.
% 7.22/1.82 | |
% 7.22/1.82 | End of split
% 7.22/1.82 |
% 7.22/1.82 End of proof
% 7.22/1.82 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.22/1.82
% 7.22/1.82 1211ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------