TSTP Solution File: COM011-2 by Gandalf---c-2.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : COM011-2 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2795MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15153/COM/COM011-2+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: small
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 27 #f 4 5)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 4 5)
% (binary-double 16 #f)
% (binary 16 #t 4 5)
% (binary-posweight-order 181 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 54 #f)
% (binary-order 27 #f 4 5)
% (binary-weightorder 71 #f)
% (binary-order 27 #f)
% (hyper-order 54 #f)
% (binary 63 #t)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(10,40,0,20,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 11 [] -c_in(X,c_minus(Y,Z,tc_set(U)),U) | c_in(X,Y,U).
% 12 [] c_in(c_^main_^osubset^i__1(X,Y,Z),X,Z) | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)).
% 13 [] -c_in(c_^main_^osubset^i__1(X,Y,Z),Y,Z) | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)).
% 14 [] -c_in(X,c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oconstrains(Y,Z,U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)) | c_in(X,c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oconstrains(V,Z,U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)) | -c_lessequals(V,Y,tc_set(U)).
% 15 [] -c_in(X,c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oconstrains(c_minus(Y,Z,tc_set(U)),c_union(Y,Z,U),U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)) | -c_in(X,c_^w^fair_^otransient(c_minus(Y,Z,tc_set(U)),U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)) | c_in(X,c_^w^fair_^oensures(Y,Z,U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)).
% 16 [] -c_in(X,c_^w^fair_^oensures(Y,Z,U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)) | c_in(X,c_^w^fair_^oleads^to(Y,Z,U),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(U)).
% 17 [] -c_in(X,c_^w^fair_^otransient(Y,Z),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(Z)) | c_in(X,c_^w^fair_^otransient(U,Z),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(Z)) | -c_lessequals(U,Y,tc_set(Z)).
% 18 [] c_in(v_^f,c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oconstrains(v_^a,c_union(v_^a,v_^b,t_a),t_a),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(t_a)).
% 19 [] c_in(v_^f,c_^w^fair_^otransient(v_^a,t_a),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(t_a)).
% 20 [] -c_in(v_^f,c_^w^fair_^oleads^to(v_^a,v_^b,t_a),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(t_a)).
% 25 [hyper:11,12] c_in(c_^main_^osubset^i__1(c_minus(X,Y,tc_set(Z)),U,Z),X,Z) | c_lessequals(c_minus(X,Y,tc_set(Z)),U,tc_set(Z)).
% 60 [hyper:13,25] c_lessequals(c_minus(X,Y,tc_set(Z)),X,tc_set(Z)).
% 70 [hyper:14,60,18] c_in(v_^f,c_^u^n^i^t^y_^oconstrains(c_minus(v_^a,X,tc_set(t_a)),c_union(v_^a,v_^b,t_a),t_a),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(t_a)).
% 74 [hyper:17,60,19] c_in(v_^f,c_^w^fair_^otransient(c_minus(v_^a,X,tc_set(t_a)),t_a),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(t_a)).
% 87 [hyper:15,70,cut:74] c_in(v_^f,c_^w^fair_^oensures(v_^a,v_^b,t_a),tc_^u^n^i^t^y_^oprogram(t_a)).
% 89 [hyper:16,87,cut:20] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 5
% clause depth limited to 4
% seconds given: 27
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    17
%  derived clauses:   153
%  kept clauses:      28
%  kept size sum:     626
%  kept mid-nuclei:   30
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    16
%  forw double-subs: 27
%  forw overdouble-subs: 14
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  2
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  1
%  real runtime  :  0.2
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           34
%  length fails:    4
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  8
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 22
%  full subs fail:  8
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP15153/COM/COM011-2+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------