TSTP Solution File: COM011-2 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : COM011-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 18:05:33 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16716/COM/COM011-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29] [nf = 0] [nu = 19] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 130] [nf = 1] [nu = 72] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 477] [nf = 10] [nu = 198] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2304] [nf = 64] [nu = 602] [ut = 82]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15623] [nf = 326] [nu = 1735] [ut = 159]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71014] [nf = 1489] [nu = 5036] [ut = 353]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 277042] [nf = 5742] [nu = 10398] [ut = 406]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 959019] [nf = 16755] [nu = 25784] [ut = 455]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 46 secs [nr = 3086199] [nf = 50841] [nu = 50945] [ut = 463]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 7010050] [nf = 93809] [nu = 104306] [ut = 463]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 7010267] [nf = 93810] [nu = 104367] [ut = 463]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 7011286] [nf = 93823] [nu = 104499] [ut = 463]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 7037757] [nf = 93890] [nu = 107702] [ut = 463]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 7181854] [nf = 96440] [nu = 111602] [ut = 463]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 157 secs [nr = 8904822] [nf = 111918] [nu = 221847] [ut = 666]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 15596936
% resolvents: 15363861 factors: 233075
% Number of unit clauses generated: 328112
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 2.10
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 3 [1] = 15 [2] = 1 [3] = 2
% [4] = 61 [5] = 77 [6] = 397 [7] = 208
% [8] = 49 [9] = 8
% Total = 821
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 328112 [2] = 8798764 [3] = 6146087 [4] = 323973
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_in_3 (+)16 (-)16
% [1] c_lessequals_3 (+)789 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)805 (-)16
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 821
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 15676467
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1728032
% Number of successful unifications: 15596936
% Number of unification failures: 437219414
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 256
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 304979876
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 13959454
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 50520694
% Max entries in substitution set: 39
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 207449
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 39116
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 55
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 10
% Number of states in UCFA table: 20395
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 32826
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.04
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.62
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 49
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 452816350
% ConstructUnitClause() = 208267
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.71 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 51990
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------