TSTP Solution File: COM011-1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : COM011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:42:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 73.59s 10.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 73.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 8 unt; 2 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(X1,X2,X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3))
| ~ c_lessequals(X4,X1,tc_set(X3))
| c_in(X0,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(X4,X2,X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_UNITY_Oconstrains__weaken__L_0) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)),c_union(X1,X2,X3),X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3))
| ~ c_in(X0,c_WFair_Otransient(c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)),X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3))
| c_in(X0,c_WFair_Oensures(X1,X2,X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WFair_OensuresI_0) ).
cnf(c_61,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_WFair_Oensures(X1,X2,X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3))
| c_in(X0,c_WFair_OleadsTo(X1,X2,X3),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WFair_OleadsTo__Basis_0) ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_WFair_Otransient(X1,X2),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X2))
| ~ c_lessequals(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
| c_in(X0,c_WFair_Otransient(X3,X2),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WFair_Otransient__strengthen_0) ).
cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_F,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(v_A,c_union(v_A,v_B,t_a),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(v_A,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_F,c_WFair_OleadsTo(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_174,plain,
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X0,X2)
| c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).
cnf(c_175,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X0,X1,X2),X1,X2)
| c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).
cnf(c_177,plain,
c_lessequals(X0,X0,tc_set(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_1382,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)),X3)
| c_in(X0,X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-2.ax',cls_Set_ODiffE_1) ).
cnf(c_173990,plain,
( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_minus(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)),X3,X2),X0,X2)
| c_lessequals(c_minus(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)),X3,tc_set(X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_174,c_1382]) ).
cnf(c_174095,plain,
c_lessequals(c_minus(X0,X1,tc_set(X2)),X0,tc_set(X2)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_173990,c_175]) ).
cnf(c_181251,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(X0,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_62]) ).
cnf(c_181405,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(X0,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_181251,c_62]) ).
cnf(c_181442,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(c_minus(X0,X1,tc_set(t_a)),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_174095,c_181405]) ).
cnf(c_182828,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(X0,c_union(v_A,v_B,t_a),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_182977,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,X1,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_lessequals(X1,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(X0,c_union(v_A,v_B,t_a),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_182828,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_183020,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X0,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(c_minus(X0,X1,tc_set(t_a)),c_union(v_A,v_B,t_a),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_174095,c_182977]) ).
cnf(c_187764,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(c_minus(v_A,v_B,tc_set(t_a)),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a))
| ~ c_lessequals(v_A,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Oensures(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_183020,c_60]) ).
cnf(c_187771,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(c_minus(v_A,v_B,tc_set(t_a)),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Oensures(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_187764,c_177]) ).
cnf(c_244096,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(v_A,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Oensures(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_181442,c_187771]) ).
cnf(c_244097,plain,
c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Oensures(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_244096,c_177]) ).
cnf(c_244098,plain,
c_in(v_F,c_WFair_OleadsTo(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_244097,c_61]) ).
cnf(c_244099,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_244098,c_65]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : COM011-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 13:41:25 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 73.59/10.82 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 73.59/10.82 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ iProver source info
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 73.59/10.82 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 73.59/10.82 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 73.59/10.82 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Parsing...successful
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 823 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 69 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Proving...
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Problem Properties
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 clauses 310
% 73.59/10.82 conjectures 3
% 73.59/10.82 EPR 26
% 73.59/10.82 Horn 283
% 73.59/10.82 unary 84
% 73.59/10.82 binary 176
% 73.59/10.82 lits 586
% 73.59/10.82 lits eq 166
% 73.59/10.82 fd_pure 0
% 73.59/10.82 fd_pseudo 0
% 73.59/10.82 fd_cond 23
% 73.59/10.82 fd_pseudo_cond 40
% 73.59/10.82 AC symbols 0
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------
% 73.59/10.82 Current options:
% 73.59/10.82 ------
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 ------ Proving...
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 73.59/10.82
% 73.59/10.82
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------