TSTP Solution File: COM011-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : COM011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:44:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 10.06s 10.26s
% Output   : Refutation 10.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w))
    | ~ c_in(x,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(v,y,w),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(w))
    | c_in(x,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(u,y,w),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(w)) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_WFair_Otransient(c_minus(v,w,tc_set(x)),x),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(x))
    | ~ c_in(u,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(c_minus(v,w,tc_set(x)),c_union(v,w,x),x),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(x))
    | c_in(u,c_WFair_Oensures(v,w,x),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(x)) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_WFair_Oensures(v,w,x),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(x))
    | c_in(u,c_WFair_OleadsTo(v,w,x),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(x)) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w))
    | ~ c_in(x,c_WFair_Otransient(v,w),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(w))
    | c_in(x,c_WFair_Otransient(u,w),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(w)) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    c_in(v_F,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(v_A,c_union(v_A,v_B,t_a),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(v_A,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_F,c_WFair_OleadsTo(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(175,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_minus(v,w,tc_set(x)),x)
    | c_in(u,v,x) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(324,axiom,
    ( c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(u,v,w),u,w) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(325,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(u,v,w),v,w)
    | c_lessequals(u,v,tc_set(w)) ),
    file('COM011-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(1391,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(u,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,14]),
    [iquote('0:Res:16.0,14.0')] ).

cnf(1398,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Oensures(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,17]),
    [iquote('0:Res:13.1,17.0')] ).

cnf(1422,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(u,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
    | c_in(v_F,c_UNITY_Oconstrains(u,c_union(v_A,v_B,t_a),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[15,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:15.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(1695,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_minus(u,v,tc_set(w)),x,tc_set(w))
    | c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(c_minus(u,v,tc_set(w)),x,w),u,w) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[324,175]),
    [iquote('0:Res:324.1,175.0')] ).

cnf(5780,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(v_A,v_B,tc_set(t_a)),v_A,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Otransient(c_minus(v_A,v_B,tc_set(t_a)),t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a))
    | c_in(v_F,c_WFair_Oensures(v_A,v_B,t_a),tc_UNITY_Oprogram(t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1422,12]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1422.1,12.1')] ).

cnf(5786,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(v_A,v_B,tc_set(t_a)),v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[5780,1391,1398]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:5780.1,5780.2,1391.1,1398.0')] ).

cnf(14862,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(c_minus(u,v,tc_set(w)),u,tc_set(w))
    | c_lessequals(c_minus(u,v,tc_set(w)),u,tc_set(w)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1695,325]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1695.1,325.0')] ).

cnf(14879,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(u,v,tc_set(w)),u,tc_set(w)),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[14862]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:14862.0')] ).

cnf(14880,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[14879,5786]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:14879.0,5786.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COM011-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 19:29:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.06/10.26  
% 10.06/10.26  SPASS V 3.9 
% 10.06/10.26  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 10.06/10.26  % SZS status Theorem
% 10.06/10.26  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 10.06/10.26  SPASS derived 11050 clauses, backtracked 376 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 6119 clauses.
% 10.06/10.26  SPASS allocated 95534 KBytes.
% 10.06/10.26  SPASS spent	0:00:09.60 on the problem.
% 10.06/10.26  		0:00:00.09 for the input.
% 10.06/10.26  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 10.06/10.26  		0:00:00.37 for inferences.
% 10.06/10.26  		0:00:00.02 for the backtracking.
% 10.06/10.26  		0:00:08.79 for the reduction.
% 10.06/10.26  
% 10.06/10.26  
% 10.06/10.26  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 19 :
% 10.06/10.26  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 10.06/10.26  Formulae used in the proof : cls_UNITY_Oconstrains__weaken__L_0 cls_WFair_OensuresI_0 cls_WFair_OleadsTo__Basis_0 cls_WFair_Otransient__strengthen_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_2 cls_Set_ODiffE_1 cls_Set_OsubsetI_0 cls_Set_OsubsetI_1
% 10.06/10.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------