TSTP Solution File: COM010-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : COM010-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:53:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  33   ~;  32   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f46,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f10,f15,f20,f25,f29,f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( v_F != v_F
    | spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f9,f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( v_F = v_G
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f34,f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : c_UNITY_Omk__program(c_Pair(c_UNITY_OInit(X0,X1),c_Pair(c_UNITY_OActs(X0,X1),c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(X0,X1),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1)))),tc_set(X1),tc_prod(tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))))),X1) = X0
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( spl0_5
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : c_UNITY_Omk__program(c_Pair(c_UNITY_OInit(X0,X1),c_Pair(c_UNITY_OActs(X0,X1),c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(X0,X1),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1)))),tc_set(X1),tc_prod(tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))))),X1) = X0 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( v_G = c_UNITY_Omk__program(c_Pair(c_UNITY_OInit(v_F,t_a),c_Pair(c_UNITY_OActs(v_F,t_a),c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_F,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a)))),tc_set(t_a),tc_prod(tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))))),t_a)
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_3
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f33,f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( c_UNITY_OActs(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OActs(v_G,t_a)
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> c_UNITY_OActs(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OActs(v_G,t_a) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( v_G = c_UNITY_Omk__program(c_Pair(c_UNITY_OInit(v_F,t_a),c_Pair(c_UNITY_OActs(v_G,t_a),c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_F,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a)))),tc_set(t_a),tc_prod(tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))))),t_a)
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f30,f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_G,t_a)
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_G,t_a) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( v_G = c_UNITY_Omk__program(c_Pair(c_UNITY_OInit(v_F,t_a),c_Pair(c_UNITY_OActs(v_G,t_a),c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_G,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a)))),tc_set(t_a),tc_prod(tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(t_a,t_a))))),t_a)
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_5 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f28,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( c_UNITY_OInit(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OInit(v_G,t_a)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> c_UNITY_OInit(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OInit(v_G,t_a) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( v_F != v_G
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> v_F = v_G ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    spl0_5,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f5,f27]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : c_UNITY_Omk__program(c_Pair(c_UNITY_OInit(X0,X1),c_Pair(c_UNITY_OActs(X0,X1),c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(X0,X1),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1)))),tc_set(X1),tc_prod(tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))),tc_set(tc_set(tc_prod(X1,X1))))),X1) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_UNITY_Osurjective__mk__program_0) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    spl0_4,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f3,f22]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OAllowedActs(v_G,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    spl0_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f2,f17]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    c_UNITY_OActs(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OActs(v_G,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1,f12]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_UNITY_OInit(v_F,t_a) = c_UNITY_OInit(v_G,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f4,f7]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    v_F != v_G,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : COM010-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 17:06:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.44  % (9632)dis+10_1:1024_anc=all:drc=off:flr=on:fsr=off:sac=on:urr=on:i=292:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/292Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  % (9649)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:fd=preordered:plsq=on:sp=occurrence:to=lpo:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Time elapsed: 0.058 s
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % (9632)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % (9619)Success in time 0.113 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------