TSTP Solution File: COM009-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : COM009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:21:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.31s 0.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   5 unt;   2 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   7 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_UNITY_Ototalize(v_F,t_a) != v_F
    | ~ c_UNITY_Oall__total(v_F,t_a) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YPYC74by9p/E---3.1_27556.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_UNITY_Oall__total__imp__totalize_0,axiom,
    ( c_UNITY_Ototalize(X1,X2) = X1
    | ~ c_UNITY_Oall__total(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YPYC74by9p/E---3.1_27556.p',cls_UNITY_Oall__total__imp__totalize_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_UNITY_Oall__total(v_F,t_a)
    | c_UNITY_Ototalize(v_F,t_a) = v_F ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YPYC74by9p/E---3.1_27556.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_UNITY_Oall__total__totalize_0,axiom,
    c_UNITY_Oall__total(c_UNITY_Ototalize(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YPYC74by9p/E---3.1_27556.p',cls_UNITY_Oall__total__totalize_0) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_UNITY_Ototalize(v_F,t_a) != v_F
    | ~ c_UNITY_Oall__total(v_F,t_a) ),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( c_UNITY_Ototalize(X1,X2) = X1
    | ~ c_UNITY_Oall__total(X1,X2) ),
    cls_UNITY_Oall__total__imp__totalize_0 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_UNITY_Oall__total(v_F,t_a)
    | c_UNITY_Ototalize(v_F,t_a) = v_F ),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_UNITY_Oall__total(v_F,t_a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    c_UNITY_Oall__total(c_UNITY_Ototalize(X1,X2),X2),
    cls_UNITY_Oall__total__totalize_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    c_UNITY_Ototalize(v_F,t_a) = v_F,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.23  % Problem    : COM009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.24  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.24/0.45  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.45  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.24/0.45  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.24/0.45  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.24/0.45  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.24/0.45  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:58:27 EDT 2023
% 0.24/0.45  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.31/0.70  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.31/0.70  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YPYC74by9p/E---3.1_27556.p
% 0.31/0.72  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.31/0.72  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.72  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # sh5l with pid 27642 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.31/0.72  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.72  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.31/0.72  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.72  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27645 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.31/0.72  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.72  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.31/0.72  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.72  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.72  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.72  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.31/0.72  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.31/0.72  
% 0.31/0.72  # Proof found!
% 0.31/0.72  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.31/0.72  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/0.72  # Parsed axioms                        : 1371
% 0.31/0.72  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1367
% 0.31/0.72  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.31/0.72  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.31/0.72  # Processed clauses                    : 10
% 0.31/0.72  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 0.31/0.72  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.31/0.72  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.31/0.72  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.31/0.72  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Paramodulations                      : 5
% 0.31/0.72  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.31/0.72  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.31/0.72  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.31/0.72  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.31/0.72  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.31/0.72  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.31/0.72  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.31/0.72  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/0.72  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.31/0.72  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.31/0.72  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.31/0.72  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1
% 0.31/0.72  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.31/0.72  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.31/0.72  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.31/0.72  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7846
% 0.31/0.72  
% 0.31/0.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.72  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.31/0.72  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.31/0.72  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.31/0.72  # Maximum resident set size: 2828 pages
% 0.31/0.72  
% 0.31/0.72  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.72  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.31/0.72  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.31/0.72  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.31/0.72  # Maximum resident set size: 2400 pages
% 0.31/0.72  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.31/0.73  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------