TSTP Solution File: COM008+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : COM008+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:14:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 49 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 149 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 184 ( 84 ~; 82 |; 12 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 80 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goal_to_be_proved,conjecture,
goal,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',goal_to_be_proved) ).
fof(found,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X1)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,X1) )
=> goal ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',found) ).
fof(ih_cfl,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( rewrite(a,X1)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3) )
=> ? [X4] :
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,X4)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',ih_cfl) ).
fof(transitivity_of_transitive_reflexive_rewrite,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,X3) )
=> transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_transitive_reflexive_rewrite) ).
fof(equal_or_rewrite,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
=> ( X1 = X2
| ? [X3] :
( rewrite(X1,X3)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',equal_or_rewrite) ).
fof(assumption,axiom,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,b)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,c) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',assumption) ).
fof(lo_cfl,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( rewrite(X1,X2)
& rewrite(X1,X3) )
=> ? [X4] :
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,X4)
& transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',lo_cfl) ).
fof(equality_in_transitive_reflexive_rewrite,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
=> transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',equality_in_transitive_reflexive_rewrite) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ goal,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goal_to_be_proved]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,X2)
| goal ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[found])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ goal,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( goal
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ goal,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X6,esk2_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ rewrite(a,X5)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X5,X6)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X5,X7) )
& ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X7,esk2_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ rewrite(a,X5)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X5,X6)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X5,X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ih_cfl])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X4,X5)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X5,X6)
| transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_transitive_reflexive_rewrite])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,esk2_3(X1,X3,X2))
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3)
| ~ rewrite(a,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,esk2_3(X1,X3,X2))
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3)
| ~ rewrite(a,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ rewrite(a,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,esk2_3(X1,X2,c))
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,c)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,esk2_3(X2,X3,X4))
| ~ rewrite(a,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,X3)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( rewrite(X4,esk3_2(X4,X5))
| X4 = X5
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X4,X5) )
& ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
| X4 = X5
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_or_rewrite])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ rewrite(a,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,c)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = X2
| rewrite(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2))
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( a = X1
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(a,X1),c)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(a,X1),X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X1 = X2
| transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[assumption]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c = a
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(a,c),X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( c = a
| ~ rewrite(a,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(a,c),X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X6,esk1_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ rewrite(X5,X6)
| ~ rewrite(X5,X7) )
& ( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X7,esk1_3(X5,X6,X7))
| ~ rewrite(X5,X6)
| ~ rewrite(X5,X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[lo_cfl])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( c = a
| ~ rewrite(a,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(a,c),X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,b)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,esk1_3(X1,X3,X2))
| ~ rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ rewrite(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( c = a
| ~ rewrite(X1,esk3_2(a,c))
| ~ rewrite(a,X2)
| ~ rewrite(X1,X3)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,esk1_3(X1,esk3_2(a,c),X3))
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,b) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,esk1_3(X1,X3,X2))
| ~ rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ rewrite(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( X3 != X4
| transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equality_in_transitive_reflexive_rewrite])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( c = a
| ~ rewrite(X1,esk3_2(a,c))
| ~ rewrite(a,X2)
| ~ rewrite(X1,X2)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X2,b) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X2)
| X1 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,b),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[assumption]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( c = a
| ~ rewrite(a,X1)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,b) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_23]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,b)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( c = a
| a = X1
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(esk3_2(a,X1),b)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,c)
| ~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(X1,a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_40]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( b = a
| c = a ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_25]),c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
~ transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
b = a,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_39])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : COM008+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:56:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 49
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 33
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 16
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 374
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 190
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 184
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 75
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 2042
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2068
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 231
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 2041
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 101
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 96
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1179
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 11200
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 82
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13946
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5446
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 376
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 47214
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.093 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.098 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 4888 pages
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------