TSTP Solution File: COM008+1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : COM008+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:48:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 3.59s 3.78s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : COM008+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 06:47:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.68/1.90 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.68/1.90 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 1.68/1.90 Wed Jul 27 06:47:36 2022
% 1.68/1.90 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 6942.
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.68/1.90 set(auto).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.68/1.90 clear(print_given).
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 formula_list(usable).
% 1.68/1.90 all A (transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,A)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,A)->goal).
% 1.68/1.90 transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,b).
% 1.68/1.90 transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,c).
% 1.68/1.90 all A e_qualish(A,A).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B (e_qualish(A,B)->e_qualish(B,A)).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B (e_qualish(A,B)->transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B (rewrite(A,B)->transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B C (transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,C)->transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B C (rewrite(A,B)&rewrite(A,C)-> (exists D (transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,D)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,D)))).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B C (rewrite(a,A)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C)-> (exists D (transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,D)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,D)))).
% 1.68/1.90 all A B (transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)->e_qualish(A,B)| (exists C (rewrite(A,C)&transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,B)))).
% 1.68/1.90 -goal.
% 1.68/1.90 end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 list(usable).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,A)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,A)|goal.
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,b).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,c).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] e_qualish(A,A).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(B,A).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -rewrite(A,B)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -rewrite(A,B)| -rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,$f1(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -rewrite(A,B)| -rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,$f1(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -rewrite(a,A)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,$f2(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -rewrite(a,A)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,$f2(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)|e_qualish(A,B)|rewrite(A,$f3(A,B)).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)|e_qualish(A,B)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite($f3(A,B),B).
% 1.68/1.90 0 [] -goal.
% 1.68/1.90 end_of_list.
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 1.68/1.90 be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.68/1.90 satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: set(factor).
% 1.68/1.90 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.68/1.90
% 1.68/1.90 ------------> process usable:
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 1 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(b,A)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(c,A)|goal.
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 2 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|e_qualish(B,A).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] -e_qualish(A,B)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 4 [] -rewrite(A,B)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 6 [] -rewrite(A,B)| -rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,$f1(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 7 [] -rewrite(A,B)| -rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,$f1(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 8 [] -rewrite(a,A)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(B,$f2(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 9 [] -rewrite(a,A)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)| -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,C)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite(C,$f2(A,B,C)).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)|e_qualish(A,B)|rewrite(A,$f3(A,B)).
% 1.68/1.90 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 11 [] -transitive_reflexive_rewrite(A,B)|e_qualish(A,B)|transitive_reflexive_rewrite($f3(A,B),B).
% 3.59/3.78 ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 12 [] -goal.
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 ------------> process sos:
% 3.59/3.78 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 15 [] transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,b).
% 3.59/3.78 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 16 [] transitive_reflexive_rewrite(a,c).
% 3.59/3.78 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] e_qualish(A,A).
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 Resetting weight limit to 24.
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 Resetting weight limit to 24.
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 sos_size=2440
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 ============ end of search ============
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 -------------- statistics -------------
% 3.59/3.78 clauses given 2810
% 3.59/3.78 clauses generated 90876
% 3.59/3.78 clauses kept 2824
% 3.59/3.78 clauses forward subsumed 1849
% 3.59/3.78 clauses back subsumed 0
% 3.59/3.78 Kbytes malloced 5859
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 3.59/3.78 user CPU time 1.87 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 3.59/3.78 system CPU time 0.01 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 3.59/3.78 wall-clock time 4 (0 hr, 0 min, 4 sec)
% 3.59/3.78
% 3.59/3.78 Process 6942 finished Wed Jul 27 06:47:40 2022
% 3.59/3.78 Otter interrupted
% 3.59/3.78 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------