TSTP Solution File: COM007+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : COM007+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:43:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.67s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem  : COM007+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 18:13:23 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34  Thu Jun 16 18:13:23 2022
% 0.11/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14275.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  formula_list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.34  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.11/0.34  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.11/0.34  clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.36  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.36  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.36  number of clauses in intial UL: 8
% 0.17/0.36  number of clauses initially in problem: 11
% 0.17/0.36  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 0.17/0.36  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.17/0.36  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.36  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.17/0.36     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.17/0.36     distinct function count: 1
% 0.17/0.36     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  
% 0.17/0.36  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 3 [ 1 1 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 4 [ 1 0 181 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 5 [ 2 0 134 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 6 [ 1 1 62 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 7 [ 3 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 8 [ 3 0 148 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 9 [ 3 0 133 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.50 sec ----> 241 [binary,240.1,7.1] {-} $F.
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Length of proof is 12.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  1 [] {+} -reflexive_rewrite(b,A)| -reflexive_rewrite(c,A)|goal.
% 0.67/0.87  2 [] {+} A!=B|reflexive_rewrite(A,B).
% 0.67/0.87  3 [] {+} -rewrite(A,B)|reflexive_rewrite(A,B).
% 0.67/0.87  4 [] {+} -reflexive_rewrite(A,B)|A=B|rewrite(A,B).
% 0.67/0.87  5 [] {+} -rewrite(A,B)| -rewrite(A,C)|rewrite(B,$f1(A,B,C)).
% 0.67/0.87  6 [] {+} -rewrite(A,B)| -rewrite(A,C)|rewrite(C,$f1(A,B,C)).
% 0.67/0.87  7 [] {+} -goal.
% 0.67/0.87  9 [] {+} reflexive_rewrite(a,b).
% 0.67/0.87  10 [] {+} reflexive_rewrite(a,c).
% 0.67/0.87  11 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.67/0.87  12 [hyper,9,4,flip.1] {+} b=a|rewrite(a,b).
% 0.67/0.87  15 [hyper,10,4,flip.1] {+} c=a|rewrite(a,c).
% 0.67/0.87  23 [para_from,12.1.1,1.1.1,unit_del,7] {-} -reflexive_rewrite(a,A)| -reflexive_rewrite(c,A)|rewrite(a,b).
% 0.67/0.87  33 [para_from,15.1.1,1.2.1,unit_del,7] {-} -reflexive_rewrite(b,A)| -reflexive_rewrite(a,A)|rewrite(a,c).
% 0.67/0.87  34 [hyper,11,2] {+} reflexive_rewrite(A,A).
% 0.67/0.87  77 [hyper,33,34,9] {+} rewrite(a,c).
% 0.67/0.87  89 [hyper,23,10,34] {+} rewrite(a,b).
% 0.67/0.87  91 [hyper,89,6,77] {-} rewrite(b,$f1(a,c,b)).
% 0.67/0.87  93 [hyper,89,5,77] {-} rewrite(c,$f1(a,c,b)).
% 0.67/0.87  119 [hyper,91,3] {+} reflexive_rewrite(b,$f1(a,c,b)).
% 0.67/0.87  147 [hyper,93,3] {-} reflexive_rewrite(c,$f1(a,c,b)).
% 0.67/0.87  240 [hyper,119,1,147] {-} goal.
% 0.67/0.87  241 [binary,240.1,7.1] {-} $F.
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.67/0.87  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  ============ end of search ============
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  true clauses given          13      (35.1%)
% 0.67/0.87  false clauses given         24
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.67/0.87     6  0         1
% 0.67/0.87     9  0         4
% 0.67/0.87    12  4         32
% 0.67/0.87    15  26        22
% 0.67/0.87    18  16        14
% 0.67/0.87    21  10        9
% 0.67/0.87  tot:  56        82      (59.4% true)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Model 9 [ 3 0 133 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.67/0.87  
% 0.67/0.87  Process 14275 finished Thu Jun 16 18:13:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------