TSTP Solution File: COM006-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : COM006-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 18:04:47 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.08s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27489/COM/COM006-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 518] [nf = 0] [nu = 53] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2390] [nf = 0] [nu = 306] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17782] [nf = 0] [nu = 943] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 118322] [nf = 264] [nu = 2492] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 669662] [nf = 5232] [nu = 6057] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 3020650] [nf = 21440] [nu = 14294] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 109 secs [nr = 12274066] [nf = 75076] [nu = 33155] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 13676032] [nf = 86668] [nu = 35135] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 13677904] [nf = 86668] [nu = 35388] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 13693364] [nf = 86688] [nu = 36025] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 13807757] [nf = 87212] [nu = 37574] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 14846959] [nf = 96324] [nu = 42291] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 188 secs [nr = 26962314] [nf = 283584] [nu = 96896] [ut = 84]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 55007532
% resolvents: 53955366 factors: 1052166
% Number of unit clauses generated: 384868
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.70
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [1] = 43 [2] = 40
% Total = 84
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 384868 [2] = 13247266 [3] = 30600553 [4] = 9701675 [5] = 999267 [6] = 67487
% [7] = 6416
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ap_1 (+)1 (-)3
% [1] aq_1 (+)1 (-)3
% [2] ar_1 (+)1 (-)3
% [3] as_1 (+)1 (-)3
% [4] at_1 (+)0 (-)4
% [5] p_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] pp_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] pqr1_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [8] pqr2_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [9] pqr3_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [10] pqr4_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [11] pr_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] q_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] qq_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] qrs1_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [15] qrs2_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [16] qrs3_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [17] qrs4_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [18] qs_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] r_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] rr_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] rst1_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [22] rst2_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [23] rst3_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [24] rst4_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [25] rt_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] s_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] sp_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ss_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] stp1_1 (+)0 (-)4
% [30] stp2_1 (+)0 (-)4
% [31] stp3_1 (+)0 (-)4
% [32] stp4_1 (+)0 (-)4
% [33] t_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] tpq1_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [35] tpq2_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [36] tpq3_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [37] tpq4_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [38] tq_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] tt_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)4 (-)80
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 84
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 177715853
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 137690880
% Number of successful unifications: 55007532
% Number of unification failures: 9091142
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 391510887
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3270562300
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 346665
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 17123
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 108
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 210
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.51
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 76
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 64098674
% ConstructUnitClause() = 346748
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.48 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 183358
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------