TSTP Solution File: COM003-2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : COM003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:35:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : COM003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 13:02:29 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.49/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.49/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.49/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.49/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.49/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.49/0.64  
% 0.49/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.040000s
% 0.49/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.040000s
% 0.49/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.64  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.64  % File     : COM003-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.49/0.64  % Domain   : Computing Theory
% 0.49/0.65  % Problem  : The halting problem is undecidable
% 0.49/0.65  % Version  : [Bru91] axioms.
% 0.49/0.65  % English  :
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % Refs     : [Bur87b] Burkholder (1987), A 76th Automated Theorem Proving Pr
% 0.49/0.65  %          : [Bru91] Brushi (1991), The Halting Problem
% 0.49/0.65  % Source   : [Bru91]
% 0.49/0.65  % Names    : - [Bru91]
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.65  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.49/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (   1 unt;   2 nHn;  35 RR)
% 0.49/0.65  %            Number of literals    :  109 (   0 equ;  65 neg)
% 0.49/0.65  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 0.49/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.49/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :   17 (  17 usr;   0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 0.49/0.65  %            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.49/0.65  %            Number of variables   :  103 (  24 sgn)
% 0.49/0.65  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % Comments :
% 0.49/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.65  %----Definitions of the new predicates.
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (program_decides(X) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %         (all Y (program(Y) -> (all Z decides(X,Y,Z)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_decides1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program(Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | decides(X,Y,Z) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_decides2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | program(f2(X)) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_decides3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ decides(X,f2(X),f1(X)) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (program_program_decides(X) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %         (program(X) & program_decides(X)))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_program_decides1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | program(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_program_decides2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_decides(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_program_decides3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_decides(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (algorithm_program_decides(X) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %         (algorithm(X) & program_decides(X)))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(algorithm_program_decides1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ algorithm_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | algorithm(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(algorithm_program_decides2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ algorithm_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_decides(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(algorithm_program_decides3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( algorithm_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ algorithm(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_decides(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (program_halts2(X,Y) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                (program(X) & halts2(X,Y))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | program(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts3a,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts2(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts3b,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts2(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (all Z (all W (halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                              (halts3(X,Y,Z) & outputs(X,W))))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(halts3_outputs1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts3(X,Y,Z) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(halts3_outputs2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | outputs(X,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(halts3_outputs3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts3(X,Y,Z)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ outputs(X,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (program_not_halts2(X,Y) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                (program(X) & -halts2(X,Y))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_not_halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | program(X) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts3a,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_not_halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts2(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts3b,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_not_halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts2(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (all W (halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                       (halts2(X,Y) & outputs(X,W)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(halts2_outputs1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts2(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(halts2_outputs2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | outputs(X,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(halts2_outputs3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts2(X,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ outputs(X,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (all Z (all W (program_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                              (program_halts2(Y,Z) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                               halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W))))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts2_halts3_outputs1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_halts2(Y,Z) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts2_halts3_outputs2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts2_halts3_outputs3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2(Y,Z)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (all Z (all W (program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                              (program_not_halts2(Y,Z) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                               halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W))))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_not_halts2(Y,Z) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2(Y,Z)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts3_outputs(X,Y,Z,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (all W (program_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %                       (program_halts2(Y,Y) & halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts2_halts2_outputs1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_halts2(Y,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts2_halts2_outputs2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_halts2_halts2_outputs3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2(Y,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all X (all Y (all W (program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) <->
% 0.49/0.65  %               (program_not_halts2(Y,Y) & halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs1,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_not_halts2(Y,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs2,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs3,axiom,
% 0.49/0.65      ( program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(X,Y,W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2(Y,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ halts2_outputs(X,Y,W) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % New verions of the original axioms
% 0.49/0.65  % ((exists X algorithm_program_decides(X)) ->
% 0.49/0.65  %  (exists W program_program_decides(W))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom1_1,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ algorithm_program_decides(X)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_program_decides(c1) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % (all W (program_program_decides(W) ->
% 0.49/0.65  %        (all Y (all Z (program_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,Y,Z,good) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                       program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,Y,Z,bad)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom2_1,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_program_decides(W)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,Y,Z,good) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom2_2,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program_program_decides(W)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,Y,Z,bad) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % ((exists W (program(W) &
% 0.49/0.65  %             (all Y (program_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,Y,Y,good) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                     program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,Y,Y,bad))))) ->
% 0.49/0.65  %  (exists V (program(V) &
% 0.49/0.65  %             (all Y (program_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,Y,good) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                     program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,Y,bad)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom3_1,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program(W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,f3(W),f3(W),good)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,f3(W),f3(W),bad)
% 0.49/0.65      | program(c2) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom3_2,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program(W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,f3(W),f3(W),good)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,f3(W),f3(W),bad)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_halts2_halts2_outputs(c2,Y,good) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom3_3,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program(W)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,f3(W),f3(W),good)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2_halts3_outputs(W,f3(W),f3(W),bad)
% 0.49/0.65      | program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(c2,Y,bad) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  % ((exists V (program(V) &
% 0.49/0.65  %             (all Y (program_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,Y,good) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                     program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,Y,bad))))) ->
% 0.49/0.65  %  (exists U (program(U) &
% 0.49/0.65  %             (all Y ((program_halts2(Y,Y) -> halts2(U,Y)) &
% 0.49/0.65  %                     program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(U,Y,bad)))))).
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom4_1,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program(V)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,f4(V),good)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,f4(V),bad)
% 0.49/0.65      | program(c3) ) ).
% 0.49/0.65  
% 0.49/0.65  cnf(axiom4_2,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.65      ( ~ program(V)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,f4(V),good)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,f4(V),bad)
% 0.49/0.65      | ~ program_halts2(Y,Y)
% 0.49/0.65      | halts2(c3,Y) ) ).
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(axiom4_3,hypothesis,
% 0.49/0.66      ( ~ program(V)
% 0.49/0.66      | ~ program_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,f4(V),good)
% 0.49/0.66      | ~ program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(V,f4(V),bad)
% 0.49/0.66      | program_not_halts2_halts2_outputs(c3,Y,bad) ) ).
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  %--- Prove -(exists X algorithm_program_decides(X)).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(prove_algorithm_does_not_exist,negated_conjecture,
% 0.49/0.66      algorithm_program_decides(c4) ).
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.66  % Proof found
% 0.49/0.66  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.49/0.66  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.49/0.66  %ClaNum:43(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.49/0.66  %VarNum:225(SingletonVarNum:103)
% 0.49/0.66  %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.49/0.66  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.49/0.66  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.49/0.66  %goalClause: 1
% 0.49/0.66  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.49/0.66  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.49/0.66  [2]~P1(x21)+P3(a2)
% 0.49/0.66  [3]~P3(x31)+P4(x31)
% 0.49/0.66  [4]~P1(x41)+P4(x41)
% 0.49/0.66  [5]~P3(x51)+P5(x51)
% 0.49/0.66  [6]~P1(x61)+P2(x61)
% 0.49/0.66  [7]P4(x71)+P5(f6(x71))
% 0.49/0.66  [22]P4(x221)+~P7(x221,f6(x221),f7(x221))
% 0.49/0.66  [10]P5(x101)+~P12(x101,x102)
% 0.49/0.66  [11]P5(x111)+~P13(x111,x112)
% 0.49/0.66  [13]~P12(x131,x132)+P6(x131,x132)
% 0.49/0.66  [15]~P13(x151,x152)+~P6(x151,x152)
% 0.49/0.66  [18]P12(x181,x181)+~P14(x182,x181,x183)
% 0.49/0.66  [19]P6(x191,x192)+~P8(x191,x192,x193)
% 0.49/0.66  [20]P9(x201,x202)+~P8(x201,x203,x202)
% 0.49/0.66  [21]P13(x211,x211)+~P16(x212,x211,x213)
% 0.49/0.66  [23]~P14(x231,x232,x233)+P8(x231,x232,x233)
% 0.49/0.66  [24]~P16(x241,x242,x243)+P8(x241,x242,x243)
% 0.49/0.66  [30]~P3(x301)+P15(x301,x302,x303,a10)
% 0.49/0.66  [31]~P3(x311)+P17(x311,x312,x313,a3)
% 0.49/0.66  [33]P12(x331,x332)+~P15(x333,x331,x332,x334)
% 0.49/0.66  [34]P9(x341,x342)+~P10(x341,x343,x344,x342)
% 0.49/0.66  [35]P13(x351,x352)+~P17(x353,x351,x352,x354)
% 0.49/0.66  [36]P11(x361,x362,x363)+~P10(x361,x362,x363,x364)
% 0.49/0.66  [37]~P15(x371,x372,x373,x374)+P10(x371,x372,x373,x374)
% 0.49/0.66  [38]~P17(x381,x382,x383,x384)+P10(x381,x382,x383,x384)
% 0.49/0.66  [8]~P4(x81)+~P5(x81)+P3(x81)
% 0.49/0.66  [9]~P4(x91)+~P2(x91)+P1(x91)
% 0.49/0.66  [12]P13(x121,x122)+~P5(x121)+P6(x121,x122)
% 0.49/0.66  [14]~P5(x141)+~P6(x141,x142)+P12(x141,x142)
% 0.49/0.66  [16]~P4(x161)+~P5(x162)+P7(x161,x162,x163)
% 0.49/0.66  [17]~P6(x171,x172)+~P9(x171,x173)+P8(x171,x172,x173)
% 0.49/0.66  [25]~P12(x252,x252)+~P8(x251,x252,x253)+P14(x251,x252,x253)
% 0.49/0.66  [26]~P13(x262,x262)+~P8(x261,x262,x263)+P16(x261,x262,x263)
% 0.49/0.66  [32]~P9(x321,x324)+~P11(x321,x322,x323)+P10(x321,x322,x323,x324)
% 0.49/0.66  [39]~P12(x392,x393)+~P10(x391,x392,x393,x394)+P15(x391,x392,x393,x394)
% 0.49/0.66  [40]~P13(x402,x403)+~P10(x401,x402,x403,x404)+P17(x401,x402,x403,x404)
% 0.49/0.66  [27]~P5(x271)+~P14(x271,f8(x271),a10)+~P16(x271,f8(x271),a3)+P5(a4)
% 0.49/0.66  [41]~P5(x411)+~P15(x411,f9(x411),f9(x411),a10)+~P17(x411,f9(x411),f9(x411),a3)+P5(a5)
% 0.49/0.66  [29]~P5(x292)+~P14(x292,f8(x292),a10)+~P16(x292,f8(x292),a3)+P16(a4,x291,a3)
% 0.49/0.66  [42]~P5(x422)+~P15(x422,f9(x422),f9(x422),a10)+~P17(x422,f9(x422),f9(x422),a3)+P14(a5,x421,a10)
% 0.49/0.66  [43]~P5(x432)+~P15(x432,f9(x432),f9(x432),a10)+~P17(x432,f9(x432),f9(x432),a3)+P16(a5,x431,a3)
% 0.49/0.66  [28]~P12(x281,x281)+~P5(x282)+P6(a4,x281)+~P14(x282,f8(x282),a10)+~P16(x282,f8(x282),a3)
% 0.49/0.66  %EqnAxiom
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P4(a1)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,4])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P3(a2)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,4,2])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P17(a2,x511,x512,a3)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,31])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(53,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P15(a2,x531,x532,a10)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,31,30])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(59,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P16(a5,x591,a3)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,31,30,5,3,43])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(61,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P14(a5,x611,a10)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,31,30,5,3,43,42])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(63,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P5(a5)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[46,31,30,5,3,43,42,41])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(81,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P12(f9(a2),f9(a2))),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,46,31,30,5,3,43,42,41,16,12,29,38,37,36,35,34,33])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(85,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P8(a5,f8(a5),a10)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,46,31,30,5,3,43,42,41,16,12,29,38,37,36,35,34,33,24,23])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(87,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P13(f8(a5),f8(a5))),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,46,31,30,5,3,43,42,41,16,12,29,38,37,36,35,34,33,24,23,21])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(91,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P6(a5,f8(a5))),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,46,31,30,5,3,43,42,41,16,12,29,38,37,36,35,34,33,24,23,21,20,19])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(127,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P14(a5,x1271,a10)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[61])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(128,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (P16(a5,x1281,a3)),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[59])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(134,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     (~P13(a5,f8(a5))),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[81,59,128,61,127,91,63,27,28,15])).
% 0.49/0.66  cnf(164,plain,
% 0.49/0.66     ($false),
% 0.49/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[53,134,85,87,51,37,26,38,35]),
% 0.49/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.49/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.49/0.66  % Total time :0.040000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------