TSTP Solution File: COM003+3 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : COM003+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:14:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.59s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.08  % Problem  : COM003+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.02/0.09  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 17:08:20 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.30  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.30  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.09/0.30  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.09/0.30  #
% 0.09/0.30  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.30  # Number of axioms: 50 Number of unprocessed: 44
% 0.09/0.30  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.09/0.30  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.09/0.30  # Hello from C++
% 0.09/0.30  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.09/0.30  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.09/0.30  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.09/0.30  # 44 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.09/0.30  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.09/0.30  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.09/0.30  # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.09/0.30  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.09/0.30  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.09/0.30  # 43 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.09/0.30  # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.09/0.30  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.09/0.30  # Returning from population with 45 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.09/0.30  # We now have 45 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.43  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.45  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 2.18/0.58  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 3 total branch saturation attempts.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 2.59/0.63  # There were 3 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 2.59/0.63  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.59/0.63  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.59/0.63  # Begin clausification derivation
% 2.59/0.63  
% 2.59/0.63  # End clausification derivation
% 2.59/0.63  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (algorithm(esk11_0))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (decides(esk11_0,X1,X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (program(esk1_1(X1))|program(esk3_0)|~algorithm(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (program(esk3_0)|~decides(X1,esk1_1(X1),esk2_1(X1))|~algorithm(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (program(esk10_1(X1))|program(esk8_1(X1))|program(esk6_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (outputs(X1,bad)|halts2(X2,X3)|program(esk4_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (decides(esk3_0,X1,X2)|program(esk1_1(X3))|~program(X1)|~algorithm(X3))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (program(esk10_1(X1))|program(esk6_1(X1))|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (outputs(X1,good)|~halts2(X2,X3)|~decides(X1,esk4_1(X1),esk5_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (outputs(X1,good)|program(esk4_1(X1))|~halts2(X2,X3)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|program(esk10_1(X1))|program(esk8_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (decides(esk3_0,X1,X2)|~decides(X3,esk1_1(X3),esk2_1(X3))|~program(X1)|~algorithm(X3))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (halts3(X1,X2,X3)|program(esk4_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|program(esk10_1(X1))|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (program(esk10_1(X1))|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (outputs(X1,bad)|halts2(X2,X3)|~decides(X1,esk4_1(X1),esk5_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (program(esk10_1(X1))|program(esk8_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (program(esk10_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (program(esk8_1(X1))|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (halts3(X1,X2,X3)|~decides(X1,esk4_1(X1),esk5_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|program(esk10_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (outputs(esk10_1(X1),bad)|program(esk8_1(X1))|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|program(esk8_1(X1))|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (program(esk10_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (outputs(esk10_1(X1),bad)|halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|program(esk8_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|program(esk8_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (program(esk8_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|program(esk8_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (outputs(esk10_1(X1),bad)|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (outputs(esk10_1(X1),bad)|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (program(esk6_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (outputs(esk10_1(X1),bad)|halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~outputs(X1,good)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~halts2(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~outputs(X1,good)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (outputs(esk10_1(X1),bad)|halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (program(esk8_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|halts2(esk10_1(X1),X2)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X2)|~program(X1))).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (halts2(esk6_1(X1),esk7_1(X1))|~outputs(X1,good)|~outputs(X1,bad)|~halts3(X1,esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1))|~halts3(X1,X2,X2)|~program(X1)|~program(X2))).
% 2.59/0.63  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 2.59/0.63  # Begin printing tableau
% 2.59/0.63  # Found 8 steps
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (decides(esk11_0,esk1_1(esk11_0),esk2_1(esk11_0))|~program(esk1_1(esk11_0))), inference(start_rule)).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_8391, plain, (decides(esk11_0,esk1_1(esk11_0),esk2_1(esk11_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2])).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_12689, plain, (~algorithm(esk11_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_50])).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_12687, plain, (program(esk3_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_12693, plain, (~program(esk3_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12687])).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_8392, plain, (~program(esk1_1(esk11_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_8392, ...])).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_12690, plain, (halts3(esk3_0,esk3_0,X6)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_12690, ...])).
% 2.59/0.63  cnf(i_0_12691, plain, (program(esk4_1(esk3_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_12691, ...])).
% 2.59/0.63  # End printing tableau
% 2.59/0.63  # SZS output end
% 2.59/0.63  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 2.59/0.63  # Child (27363) has found a proof.
% 2.59/0.63  
% 2.59/0.63  # Proof search is over...
% 2.59/0.63  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------