TSTP Solution File: COM002-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : COM002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:43:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.20s 1.43s
% Output   : Refutation 1.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COM002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 18:20:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Thu Jun 16 18:20:21 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 7373.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.36  in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 26
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 26
% 0.20/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 26
% 0.20/0.39     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.39     distinct function count: 6
% 0.20/0.39     distinct constant count: 16
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.20/1.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.20/1.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 3 [ 1 1 128 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 6 [ 1 1 130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 7 [ 1 0 177 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 8 [ 1 1 164 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 9 [ 2 1 38885 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 10 [ 3 0 301 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 11 [ 4 0 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 12 [ 3 2 90144 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 13 [ 7 0 152 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 14 [ 4 1 215 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 15 [ 4 0 110 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 16 [ 4 1 371 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 17 [ 4 1 204 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 18 [ 5 1 203 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 19 [ 9 0 795 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 20 [ 12 3 134833 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 21 [ 10 1 110 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 22 [ 14 0 130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.03 sec ----> 51 [binary,50.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.20/1.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.20/1.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  1 [] {+} succeeds(A,B)| -follows(A,B).
% 1.20/1.43  2 [] {+} succeeds(A,B)| -succeeds(A,C)| -succeeds(C,B).
% 1.20/1.43  3 [] {+} succeeds(A,B)| -has(B,goto(C))| -labels(C,A).
% 1.20/1.43  5 [] {+} -succeeds(p3,p3).
% 1.20/1.43  9 [] {+} labels(loop,p3).
% 1.20/1.43  14 [] {+} follows(p6,p3).
% 1.20/1.43  16 [] {+} follows(p7,p6).
% 1.20/1.43  18 [] {+} follows(p8,p7).
% 1.20/1.43  19 [] {+} has(p8,goto(loop)).
% 1.20/1.43  23 [hyper,14,1] {+} succeeds(p6,p3).
% 1.20/1.43  24 [hyper,16,1] {+} succeeds(p7,p6).
% 1.20/1.43  25 [hyper,18,1] {+} succeeds(p8,p7).
% 1.20/1.43  30 [hyper,19,3,9] {+} succeeds(p3,p8).
% 1.20/1.43  34 [hyper,24,2,23] {+} succeeds(p7,p3).
% 1.20/1.43  41 [hyper,30,2,25] {+} succeeds(p3,p7).
% 1.20/1.43  50 [hyper,41,2,34] {-} succeeds(p3,p3).
% 1.20/1.43  51 [binary,50.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.20/1.43  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  ============ end of search ============
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  true clauses given           3      (10.7%)
% 1.20/1.43  false clauses given         25
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.20/1.43     3  10        2
% 1.20/1.43  tot:  10        2      (16.7% true)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Model 22 [ 14 0 130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.20/1.43  
% 1.20/1.43  Process 7373 finished Thu Jun 16 18:20:22 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------