TSTP Solution File: COM002-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COM002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 01:42:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(direct_success,axiom,
    ( succeeds(X,Y)
    | ~ follows(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_success,axiom,
    ( succeeds(X,Y)
    | ~ succeeds(X,Z)
    | ~ succeeds(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

cnf(goto_success,axiom,
    ( succeeds(X,Y)
    | ~ has(Y,goto(Z))
    | ~ labels(Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

cnf(label_state_3,hypothesis,
    labels(loop,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

cnf(transition_3_to_6,hypothesis,
    follows(p6,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_6) ).

cnf(transition_6_to_7,hypothesis,
    follows(p7,p6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_6_to_7) ).

cnf(transition_7_to_8,hypothesis,
    follows(p8,p7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_7_to_8) ).

cnf(state_8,hypothesis,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

cnf(prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ succeeds(p3,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    succeeds(p8,p7),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[direct_success,transition_7_to_8]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    succeeds(p7,p6),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[direct_success,transition_6_to_7]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    succeeds(p6,p3),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[direct_success,transition_3_to_6]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    succeeds(p3,p8),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[goto_success,state_8,label_state_3]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    succeeds(p8,p6),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_success,21,20]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    ~ succeeds(p8,p3),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_success,29,prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_success,31,23]),43]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COM002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 18:16:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T18:16:56
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T18:16:56
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  #||
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  ||#
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.52  ;        65 formulas have been input or derived (from 30 formulas).
% 0.20/0.52  ;        44 (68%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.20/0.52  ;           44 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.003  10%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (19 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Process new row              (57 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.002   6%   Resolution                   (58 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (29 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.002   6%   Forward simplification       (57 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (44 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.022  71%   Other
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.031        Total
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.033        Real time
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; Term-hash-array has 59 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4 entries (4 at peak, 4 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 8 nodes (8 at peak, 8 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 4 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 4 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Path-index has 75 entries (75 at peak, 75 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Path-index has 152 nodes (152 at peak, 152 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Trie-index has 75 entries (75 at peak, 75 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Trie-index has 145 nodes (145 at peak, 145 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Retrieved 14 generalization terms in 49 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Retrieved 39 instance terms in 39 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Retrieved 290 unifiable terms in 221 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.20/0.52  ;     3 with value 7
% 0.20/0.52  ; The agenda of rows to give has 14 entries:
% 0.20/0.52  ;    12 with value (4 6)           1 with value (4 7)            1 with value (4 8)
% 0.20/0.52  Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.52    0.033 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.52    0.025865 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.52    0.006876 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.52    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.52    0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.52    2,215,152 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.52  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.52  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T18:16:56
% 0.20/0.52  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.52  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------