TSTP Solution File: COM001_1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COM001_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CSCLEf2LzE true

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:49:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  13 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (   9   ~;   7   |;   2   &;  69   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0   ^;  18   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(state_type,type,
    state: $tType ).

thf(statement_type,type,
    statement: $tType ).

thf(label_type,type,
    label: $tType ).

thf(loop_type,type,
    loop: label ).

thf(goto_type,type,
    goto: label > statement ).

thf(succeeds_type,type,
    succeeds: state > state > $o ).

thf(p3_type,type,
    p3: state ).

thf(p8_type,type,
    p8: state ).

thf(labels_type,type,
    labels: label > state > $o ).

thf(has_type,type,
    has: state > statement > $o ).

thf(follows_type,type,
    follows: state > state > $o ).

thf(prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3,conjecture,
    succeeds @ p3 @ p3 ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( succeeds @ p3 @ p3 ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
    ~ ( succeeds @ p3 @ p3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(state_8,axiom,
    has @ p8 @ ( goto @ loop ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
    has @ p8 @ ( goto @ loop ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[state_8]) ).

thf(label_state_3,axiom,
    labels @ loop @ p3 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    labels @ loop @ p3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[label_state_3]) ).

thf(goto_success,axiom,
    ! [Goal_state: state,Label: label,Start_state: state] :
      ( ( ( has @ Start_state @ ( goto @ Label ) )
        & ( labels @ Label @ Goal_state ) )
     => ( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: label,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( ~ ( labels @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( has @ X2 @ ( goto @ X0 ) )
      | ( succeeds @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[goto_success]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ( ( succeeds @ p3 @ X0 )
      | ~ ( has @ X0 @ ( goto @ loop ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    succeeds @ p3 @ p8,
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl11]) ).

thf(transition_3_to_8,axiom,
    follows @ p8 @ p3 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
    follows @ p8 @ p3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[transition_3_to_8]) ).

thf(direct_success,axiom,
    ! [Start_state: state,Goal_state: state] :
      ( ( follows @ Goal_state @ Start_state )
     => ( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state] :
      ( ( succeeds @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( follows @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[direct_success]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
    succeeds @ p8 @ p3,
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl8,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(transitivity_of_success,axiom,
    ! [Start_state: state,Intermediate_state: state,Goal_state: state] :
      ( ( ( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Intermediate_state )
        & ( succeeds @ Intermediate_state @ Start_state ) )
     => ( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    ! [X0: state,X1: state,X2: state] :
      ( ~ ( succeeds @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( succeeds @ X2 @ X0 )
      | ( succeeds @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[transitivity_of_success]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ( ~ ( succeeds @ X0 @ p8 )
      | ( succeeds @ X0 @ p3 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl13,zip_derived_cl1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl22,plain,
    succeeds @ p3 @ p3,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl15,zip_derived_cl19]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10,zip_derived_cl22]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : COM001_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CSCLEf2LzE true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 13:07:55 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.75  % BCE start: 11
% 0.21/0.75  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.75  % PE start: 11
% 0.21/0.75  logic: neq
% 0.21/0.75  % PE eliminated: 5
% 0.21/0.75  % done 7 iterations in 0.009s
% 0.21/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.75  
% 0.21/0.75  
% 0.21/0.75  % Terminating...
% 1.39/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 1.39/0.87  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------