TSTP Solution File: COM001-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COM001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.I8NQSZZWch true
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:49:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : COM001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.I8NQSZZWch true
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 12:44:23 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.74 % BCE start: 11
% 0.21/0.74 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % PE start: 11
% 0.21/0.74 logic: neq
% 0.21/0.74 % PE eliminated: 5
% 0.21/0.74 % done 7 iterations in 0.008s
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.74 thf(p3_type, type, p3: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(follows_type, type, follows: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(loop_type, type, loop: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(p8_type, type, p8: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(goto_type, type, goto: $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(succeeds_type, type, succeeds: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(labels_type, type, labels: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(has_type, type, has: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3, conjecture, (succeeds @ p3 @ p3)).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( succeeds @ p3 @ p3 )),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (~ (succeeds @ p3 @ p3)),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(transition_3_to_8, axiom, (follows @ p8 @ p3)).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ( (follows @ p8 @ p3)),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transition_3_to_8])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(direct_success, axiom,
% 0.21/0.74 (( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( follows @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (succeeds @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (follows @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [direct_success])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, ( (succeeds @ p8 @ p3)),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.21/0.74 [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(state_8, axiom, (has @ p8 @ ( goto @ loop ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, ( (has @ p8 @ (goto @ loop))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [state_8])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(label_state_3, axiom, (labels @ loop @ p3)).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (labels @ loop @ p3)),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [label_state_3])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(goto_success, axiom,
% 0.21/0.74 (( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( has @ Start_state @ ( goto @ Label ) ) ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( labels @ Label @ Goal_state ) ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 ( (succeeds @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.21/0.74 | ~ (has @ X1 @ (goto @ X2))
% 0.21/0.74 | ~ (labels @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [goto_success])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (has @ X0 @ (goto @ loop)) | (succeeds @ p3 @ X0))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.21/0.74 [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, ( (succeeds @ p3 @ p8)),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.21/0.74 [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(transitivity_of_success, axiom,
% 0.21/0.74 (( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Start_state ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( succeeds @ Goal_state @ Intermediate_state ) ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( succeeds @ Intermediate_state @ Start_state ) ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 ( (succeeds @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.21/0.74 | ~ (succeeds @ X0 @ X2)
% 0.21/0.74 | ~ (succeeds @ X2 @ X1))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_success])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i]: ( (succeeds @ p3 @ X0) | ~ (succeeds @ p8 @ X0))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, ( (succeeds @ p3 @ p3)),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain, ($false),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % Terminating...
% 1.36/0.77 % Runner terminated.
% 1.36/0.78 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------