TSTP Solution File: COM001-1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : COM001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:53:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f34,f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    succeeds(p8,p3),
    inference(resolution,[],[f9,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ follows(X0,X1)
      | succeeds(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    follows(p8,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_8) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ~ succeeds(p8,p3),
    inference(resolution,[],[f32,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ succeeds(p3,X0)
      | ~ succeeds(X0,p3) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f11,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ succeeds(X2,X1)
      | succeeds(X0,X1)
      | ~ succeeds(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ~ succeeds(p3,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    succeeds(p3,p8),
    inference(resolution,[],[f20,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    labels(loop,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ labels(loop,X0)
      | succeeds(X0,p8) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ has(X1,goto(X3))
      | ~ labels(X3,X0)
      | succeeds(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : COM001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 16:53:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.50  % (22771)dis+1011_1:16_fsr=off:nwc=2.0:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (22777)dis+4_1:1_bd=off:cond=fast:fde=unused:lcm=reverse:lma=on:nicw=on:nwc=2.0:s2a=on:s2agt=16:sac=on:sp=frequency:i=23:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/23Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22789)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22770)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22786)lrs+10_1:7_av=off:awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:bsd=on:cond=on:drc=off:nwc=3.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:s2a=on:s2agt=16:to=lpo:urr=on:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (22781)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.52  % (22795)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.52  % (22795)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.52  % (22767)dis+21_1:1_av=off:fd=off:lcm=predicate:sos=on:spb=goal:urr=ec_only:i=42:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/42Mi)
% 0.19/0.52  TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.52  TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.52  TRYING [3]
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Time elapsed: 0.078 s
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22789)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  % (22765)Success in time 0.17 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------