%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : COM001-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/COM/COM001-1+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: hne
% detected subclass: medium
% detected subclass: short
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 12 #t 3 5)
% (binary-unit 30 #f 3 5)
% (binary-posweight-order 90 #f 3 5)
% (binary-double 30 #f)
% (binary 48 #t 3 5)
% (hyper 30 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 180 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 42 #f)
% (binary-order 30 #f)
% (binary-unit 48 #f)
% (binary 60 #t)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(11,40,0,22,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 12 [] -follows(X,Y) | succeeds(X,Y).
% 13 [] -succeeds(X,Y) | -succeeds(Y,Z) | succeeds(X,Z).
% 14 [] -has(X,goto(Y)) | -labels(Y,Z) | succeeds(Z,X).
% 16 [] labels(loop,p3).
% 20 [] follows(p8,p3).
% 21 [] has(p8,goto(loop)).
% 22 [] -succeeds(p3,p3).
% 25 [hyper:12,20] succeeds(p8,p3).
% 38 [hyper:14,21,16] succeeds(p3,p8).
% 40 [hyper:13,38,25,cut:22] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 5
% clause depth limited to 3
% seconds given: 12
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    12
%  derived clauses:   18
%  kept clauses:      5
%  kept size sum:     15
%  kept mid-nuclei:   12
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    0
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  1
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime  :  0.1
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/COM/COM001-1+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------