TSTP Solution File: COL124-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : COL124-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_OI)),c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_OI)),c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_OI)),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI))),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,v_x(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_OI)),c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI)))),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_OI)),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI))),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,v_x(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_OI)),c_Comb_OI,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI)))),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : COL124-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue May 31 05:04:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.37 % symbols: 215
% 0.20/0.37 % clauses: 1583
% 0.20/0.37 % start clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.37 % iterative deepening steps: 8
% 0.20/0.37 % maximum path limit: 0
% 0.20/0.37 % literal attempts: 189
% 0.20/0.37 % depth failures: 153
% 0.20/0.37 % regularity failures: 0
% 0.20/0.37 % tautology failures: 4
% 0.20/0.37 % reductions: 11
% 0.20/0.37 % extensions: 173
% 0.20/0.37 % SAT variables: 454
% 0.20/0.37 % SAT clauses: 274
% 0.20/0.37 % WalkSAT solutions: 259
% 0.20/0.37 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------