TSTP Solution File: COL123-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL123-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,tc_prod(Z,Z))
    | c_in(X,c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(Y,Z),tc_prod(Z,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X,Y,Z,Z),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(U,Z),tc_prod(Z,Z))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(V,X,Z,Z),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(U,Z),tc_prod(Z,Z))
    | c_in(c_Pair(V,Y,Z,Z),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(U,Z),tc_prod(Z,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_z,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_xb,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X,v_xaa(X),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_xaa(X),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_xb,X,t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X,v_xa(Y,X,Z),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(Y,Z,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(Y,X,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X,v_xa(Y,Z,X),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(Y,X,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(Y,Z,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_xaa(v_xb),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4,cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_xb,v_xaa(v_xb),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3,cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_xa(v_y,v_xaa(v_xb),v_z),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7,12,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_xaa(v_xb),v_xa(v_y,v_xaa(v_xb),v_z),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,12,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_xb,v_xa(v_y,v_xaa(v_xb),v_z),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5,19]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_xaa(v_xb),v_xa(v_y,v_xaa(v_xb),v_z),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0,22]) ).

cnf(102,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0,37,13]),74]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : COL123-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Tue May 31 10:07:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.44   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.44   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.44   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.44   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.44   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.44   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.44   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.44   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.44   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.44   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.44   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.44   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  "."
% 0.18/0.44  * 
% 0.18/0.44  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T10:07:02
% 0.18/0.44  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T10:07:02
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  #||
% 0.18/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.50  ||#
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.18/0.50  ;       234 formulas have been input or derived (from 52 formulas).
% 0.18/0.50  ;       102 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.18/0.50  ;          102 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.18/0.50  ; 
% 0.18/0.50  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.003   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.001   2%   Assert                       (9 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.012  21%   Process new row              (163 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.013  23%   Resolution                   (102 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (51 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (7 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.001   2%   Forward subsumption          (7 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.001   2%   Backward subsumption         (7 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (4 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.004   7%   Forward simplification       (163 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.001   2%   Backward simplification      (102 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.021  37%   Other
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.057        Total
% 0.18/0.50  ;     0.061        Real time
% 0.18/0.50  ; 
% 0.18/0.50  ; Term-hash-array has 215 terms in all.
% 0.18/0.50  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7 entries (7 at peak, 7 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.50  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 85 nodes (85 at peak, 85 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.50  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly forward subsuming rows in 7 calls.
% 0.18/0.50  ;  Retrieved 1 possibly backward subsumed row in 7 calls.
% 0.18/0.50  ; Path-index has 221 entries (221 at peak, 221 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.50  ; Path-index has 296 nodes (296 at peak, 296 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.50  ; Trie-index has 221 entries (221 at peak, 221 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.50  ; Trie-index has 1,536 nodes (1,536 at peak, 1,536 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.18/0.50  ; Retrieved 62 generalization terms in 167 calls.
% 0.18/0.50  ; Retrieved 94 instance terms in 94 calls.
% 0.18/0.50  ; Retrieved 1,389 unifiable terms in 816 calls.
% 0.18/0.50  ; 
% 0.18/0.50  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.18/0.50  ;     1 with value 27
% 0.18/0.50  ; The agenda of rows to give has 50 entries:
% 0.18/0.50  ;     1 with value (4 22)          2 with value (4 27)           6 with value (4 34)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     5 with value (4 23)          2 with value (4 28)           4 with value (4 35)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     7 with value (4 24)          4 with value (4 31)           4 with value (4 36)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     3 with value (4 25)          4 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 37)
% 0.18/0.50  ;     1 with value (4 26)          6 with value (4 33)
% 0.18/0.50  Evaluation took:
% 0.18/0.50    0.062 seconds of real time
% 0.18/0.50    0.051502 seconds of user run time
% 0.18/0.50    0.009799 seconds of system run time
% 0.18/0.50    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.18/0.50    0 page faults and
% 0.18/0.50    4,508,336 bytes consed.
% 0.18/0.50  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.18/0.50  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T10:07:02
% 0.18/0.50  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.18/0.50  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------