TSTP Solution File: COL121-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : COL121-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.06s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : COL121-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 15:49:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Tue May 31 15:49:28 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31288.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35  in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.06/1.24  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.06/1.24  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.06/1.24  number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 1.06/1.24  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 1.06/1.24  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 1.06/1.24  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 1.06/1.24  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 90
% 1.06/1.24  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 1.06/1.24     distinct predicate count: 2
% 1.06/1.24     distinct function count: 5
% 1.06/1.24     distinct constant count: 6
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.06/1.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.06/1.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.88 sec ----> 108 [hyper,101,7,22] {-} $F.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.06/1.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.06/1.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  1 [] {+} -c_Comb_Odiamond(A,B)| -c_in(c_Pair(C,D,B,B),A,tc_prod(B,B))| -c_in(c_Pair(C,E,B,B),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(A,B),tc_prod(B,B))|c_in(c_Pair(D,c_Comb_Odiamond__strip__lemmaE__1(A,E,D,B),B,B),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(A,B),tc_prod(B,B)).
% 1.06/1.25  2 [] {+} -c_Comb_Odiamond(A,B)| -c_in(c_Pair(C,D,B,B),A,tc_prod(B,B))| -c_in(c_Pair(C,E,B,B),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(A,B),tc_prod(B,B))|c_in(c_Pair(E,c_Comb_Odiamond__strip__lemmaE__1(A,E,D,B),B,B),A,tc_prod(B,B)).
% 1.06/1.25  3 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_prod(C,C))|c_in(A,c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(B,C),tc_prod(C,C)).
% 1.06/1.25  4 [] {+} -c_in(c_Pair(A,B,C,C),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(D,C),tc_prod(C,C))| -c_in(c_Pair(E,A,C,C),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(D,C),tc_prod(C,C))|c_in(c_Pair(E,B,C,C),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(D,C),tc_prod(C,C)).
% 1.06/1.25  5 [] {+} c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_x(A),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))| -c_in(c_Pair(v_y,A,t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  6 [] {+} c_in(c_Pair(A,v_x(A),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))| -c_in(c_Pair(v_y,A,t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  7 [] {+} -c_in(c_Pair(v_xaa,A,t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a))| -c_in(c_Pair(v_z,A,t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  8 [] {-} c_Comb_Odiamond(v_r,t_a).
% 1.06/1.25  9 [] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_z,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  10 [] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_xaa,t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  12 [hyper,10,6] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_xaa,v_x(v_xaa),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  13 [hyper,10,5] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_x(v_xaa),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  21 [hyper,13,2,8,9] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_x(v_xaa),c_Comb_Odiamond__strip__lemmaE__1(v_r,v_x(v_xaa),v_z,t_a),t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  22 [hyper,13,1,8,9] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_z,c_Comb_Odiamond__strip__lemmaE__1(v_r,v_x(v_xaa),v_z,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  40 [hyper,21,3] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_x(v_xaa),c_Comb_Odiamond__strip__lemmaE__1(v_r,v_x(v_xaa),v_z,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  101 [hyper,40,4,12] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_xaa,c_Comb_Odiamond__strip__lemmaE__1(v_r,v_x(v_xaa),v_z,t_a),t_a,t_a),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(v_r,t_a),tc_prod(t_a,t_a)).
% 1.06/1.25  108 [hyper,101,7,22] {-} $F.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.06/1.25  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  ============ end of search ============
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.06/1.25  
% 1.06/1.25  Process 31288 finished Tue May 31 15:49:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------