TSTP Solution File: COL121-2 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : COL121-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 18:03:34 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP18351/COL/COL121-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40] [nf = 0] [nu = 25] [ut = 20]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 255] [nf = 16] [nu = 108] [ut = 26]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3505] [nf = 77] [nu = 902] [ut = 93]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36564] [nf = 2145] [nu = 7608] [ut = 152]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 364268] [nf = 18199] [nu = 41866] [ut = 198]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 51 secs [nr = 2957207] [nf = 122594] [nu = 199187] [ut = 213]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 6708214] [nf = 227749] [nu = 415917] [ut = 223]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 6709011] [nf = 227765] [nu = 416367] [ut = 223]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 6716031] [nf = 227839] [nu = 418739] [ut = 223]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 6924139] [nf = 230653] [nu = 435249] [ut = 223]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 166 secs [nr = 9268866] [nf = 321034] [nu = 550346] [ut = 223]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 17454934
% resolvents: 16864328 factors: 590606
% Number of unit clauses generated: 842557
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.83
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 3 [1] = 17 [2] = 6 [3] = 67
% [4] = 59 [5] = 46 [6] = 15 [7] = 10
% Total = 223
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 842557 [2] = 13117430 [3] = 3387052 [4] = 104905 [5] = 2960 [6] = 30
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_Comb_Odiamond_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] c_in_3 (+)112 (-)110
% ------------------
% Total: (+)113 (-)110
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 223
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 8037054
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 17454934
% Number of unification failures: 1225526037
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12320
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 58144567
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 522783
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 25657979
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 663648
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 249064
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 21
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1699
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3699
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 184000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.46
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1242980971
% ConstructUnitClause() = 663868
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 1.12 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 58183
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------