TSTP Solution File: COL119-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL119-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.54s 1.11s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X0),X1),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0) ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(sP0_iProver_def,v_w) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_64,plain,
tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_65,plain,
c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(sP1_iProver_def,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_64,c_62,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
c_in(sP3_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_65]) ).
cnf(c_197,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X0),X1),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_64]) ).
cnf(c_198,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(sP0_iProver_def,X0),v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_197]) ).
cnf(c_200,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(sP1_iProver_def,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_198]) ).
cnf(c_201,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_66]) ).
cnf(c_202,plain,
~ c_in(sP3_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_65]) ).
cnf(c_203,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_67]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : COL119-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:32:53 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.54/1.11 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ iProver source info
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.54/1.11 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.54/1.11 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Proving...
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 clauses 7
% 1.54/1.11 conjectures 2
% 1.54/1.11 EPR 1
% 1.54/1.11 Horn 7
% 1.54/1.11 unary 6
% 1.54/1.11 binary 1
% 1.54/1.11 lits 8
% 1.54/1.11 lits eq 4
% 1.54/1.11 fd_pure 0
% 1.54/1.11 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.54/1.11 fd_cond 0
% 1.54/1.11 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.54/1.11 AC symbols 0
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------
% 1.54/1.11 Current options:
% 1.54/1.11 ------
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 ------ Proving...
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.54/1.11
% 1.54/1.11
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------