%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : COL119-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:52:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   2   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   3   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1,f3,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X1),X2),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : COL119-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 17:07:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  % (18348)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.19/0.49  % (18375)lrs+3_8:1_anc=none:erd=off:fsd=on:s2a=on:s2agt=16:sgt=16:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=included:i=71:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/71Mi)
% 0.19/0.50  % (18348)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Time elapsed: 0.103 s
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (18348)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (18342)Success in time 0.151 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------