TSTP Solution File: COL119-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COL119-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eNmWgwF8Tj true
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:35:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.40s 0.82s
% Output : Refutation 1.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : COL119-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eNmWgwF8Tj true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:07:02 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.40/0.82 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 1.40/0.82 % BCE start: 39
% 1.40/0.82 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.40/0.82 % PE start: 39
% 1.40/0.82 logic: eq
% 1.40/0.82 % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.40/0.82 % done 22 iterations in 0.073s
% 1.40/0.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.40/0.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.40/0.82 thf(c_in_type, type, c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(c_Comb_Oparcontract_type, type, c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(v_y_H_type, type, v_y_H: $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(v_x_H_type, type, v_x_H: $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(tc_prod_type, type, tc_prod: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(v_w_type, type, v_w: $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(tc_Comb_Ocomb_type, type, tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(c_Pair_type, type, c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(cls_conjecture_2, conjecture,
% 1.40/0.82 (~( ( ~( c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H ) @ v_w ) @
% 1.40/0.82 V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) |
% 1.40/0.82 ( ~( c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) ))).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.40/0.82 (( ~( c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H ) @ v_w ) @
% 1.40/0.82 V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) |
% 1.40/0.82 ( ~( c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) )),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_2])).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl36, plain,
% 1.40/0.82 (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.40/0.82 (~ (c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 (c_Pair @
% 1.40/0.82 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 1.40/0.82 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H) @ v_w) @
% 1.40/0.82 X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 1.40/0.82 | ~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_y_H @ X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb)))),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0, axiom,
% 1.40/0.82 (c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ V_x ) @ V_y ) @
% 1.40/0.82 V_x @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ))).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.40/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.40/0.82 (c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 (c_Pair @
% 1.40/0.82 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 1.40/0.82 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ X0) @ X1) @
% 1.40/0.82 X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0])).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl146, plain,
% 1.40/0.82 (~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl36, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 1.40/0.82 (~( c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ))).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 1.40/0.82 (c_in @
% 1.40/0.82 ( c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb )),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 1.40/0.82 ( (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_y_H @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 1.40/0.82 c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 1.40/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl147, plain, ($false),
% 1.40/0.82 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl146, zip_derived_cl37])).
% 1.40/0.82
% 1.40/0.82 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.40/0.82
% 1.40/0.82
% 1.40/0.82 % Terminating...
% 1.40/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.40/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------