TSTP Solution File: COL119-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : COL119-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.56s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('COL119-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,u,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),u,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('COL119-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(26,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,u),v),u,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('COL119-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(1480,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[26,3]),
[iquote('0:Res:26.0,3.1')] ).
cnf(1481,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1480,2]),
[iquote('0:MRR:1480.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : COL119-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.10 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Tue May 31 14:49:13 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.56
% 0.15/0.56 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.15/0.56 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.15/0.56 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.56 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.56 SPASS derived 37 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1383 clauses.
% 0.15/0.56 SPASS allocated 77892 KBytes.
% 0.15/0.56 SPASS spent 0:00:00.24 on the problem.
% 0.15/0.56 0:00:00.07 for the input.
% 0.15/0.56 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.15/0.56 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.15/0.56 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.15/0.56 0:00:00.08 for the reduction.
% 0.15/0.56
% 0.15/0.56
% 0.15/0.56 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 5 :
% 0.15/0.56 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.56 Formulae used in the proof : cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_2 cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0
% 0.15/0.56
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------