TSTP Solution File: COL119-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : COL119-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:28:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z4iwVgyVhm/E---3.1_2255.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X1),X2),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z4iwVgyVhm/E---3.1_2255.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z4iwVgyVhm/E---3.1_2255.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X1),X2),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.23 % Problem : COL119-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.24/0.24 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.24/0.45 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.45 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.24/0.45 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.24/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.24/0.45 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:33:49 EDT 2024
% 0.24/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.71 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.42/0.71 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z4iwVgyVhm/E---3.1_2255.p
% 0.57/0.76 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.57/0.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # new_bool_3 with pid 2368 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.57/0.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.76 # Search class: FHHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.76 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.76 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with pid 2373 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I
% 0.57/0.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.76 # Search class: FHHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.76 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.76 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.57/0.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S038I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.57/0.76 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 # Proof found!
% 0.57/0.76 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.76 # Parsed axioms : 1410
% 0.57/0.76 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1381
% 0.57/0.76 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.57/0.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.57/0.76 # Processed clauses : 50
% 0.57/0.76 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.57/0.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.57/0.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Generated clauses : 9
% 0.57/0.76 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.57/0.76 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.57/0.76 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # NegExts : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.57/0.76 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.57/0.76 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.76 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.76 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.76 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.76 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.57/0.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.57/0.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.57/0.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.57/0.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.57/0.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 16
% 0.57/0.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 26
% 0.57/0.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46
% 0.57/0.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.57/0.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.57/0.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.57/0.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/0.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9854
% 0.57/0.76 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2890
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.57/0.76 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.57/0.76 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.57/0.76 # Maximum resident set size: 2904 pages
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 # User time : 0.028 s
% 0.57/0.76 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.57/0.76 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.57/0.76 # Maximum resident set size: 2464 pages
% 0.57/0.76 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.57/0.76 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------