TSTP Solution File: COL118-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.38s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   8 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (  11   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   4   >;   7   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Pair > tc_prod > c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D > #nlpp > v_z > v_ya > v_x > v_w > tc_Comb_Ocomb > c_Comb_Oparcontract

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(v_x,type,
    v_x: $i ).

tff(v_z,type,
    v_z: $i ).

tff(tc_prod,type,
    tc_prod: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v_ya,type,
    v_ya: $i ).

tff(c_in,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c_Comb_Oparcontract,type,
    c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i ).

tff(v_w,type,
    v_w: $i ).

tff(c_Pair,type,
    c_Pair: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D,type,
    c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(tc_Comb_Ocomb,type,
    tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_43,axiom,
    ! [V_z,V_w,V_x,V_y] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_z,V_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_x,V_y,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(V_x,V_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(V_y,V_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_35,axiom,
    ! [V_x] : c_in(c_Pair(V_x,V_x,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [V_U] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),V_U,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),V_U,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [V_x_9,V_z_10,V_y_11,V_w_12] :
      ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(V_x_9,V_z_10),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(V_y_11,V_w_12),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_x_9,V_y_11,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_z_10,V_w_12,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [V_x_2] : c_in(c_Pair(V_x_2,V_x_2,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_35]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [V_U_8] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),V_U_8,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),V_U_8,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_12]) ).

tff(c_21,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_17]) ).

tff(c_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_2,c_21]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:13:03 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.38/1.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.38/1.61  
% 2.38/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.38/1.64  
% 2.38/1.64  Inference rules
% 2.38/1.64  ----------------------
% 2.38/1.64  #Ref     : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Sup     : 3
% 2.38/1.64  #Fact    : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Define  : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Split   : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Chain   : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Close   : 0
% 2.38/1.64  
% 2.38/1.64  Ordering : KBO
% 2.38/1.64  
% 2.38/1.64  Simplification rules
% 2.38/1.64  ----------------------
% 2.38/1.64  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Demod        : 2
% 2.38/1.64  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.38/1.64  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.38/1.64  
% 2.38/1.64  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.38/1.64  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.38/1.64  
% 2.38/1.64  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.38/1.64  ----------------------
% 2.38/1.65  Preprocessing        : 0.41
% 2.38/1.65  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.38/1.65  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.38/1.65  Main loop            : 0.16
% 2.38/1.65  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 2.38/1.65  Reduction            : 0.03
% 2.38/1.65  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.38/1.65  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.38/1.65  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.38/1.65  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.38/1.65  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.38/1.65  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.38/1.65  Total                : 0.62
% 2.38/1.65  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.38/1.65  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.38/1.65  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.38/1.65  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------