TSTP Solution File: COL118-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : COL118-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:06:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.80s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 2.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f11474,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11473,f1405]) ).
fof(f1405,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f11473,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11448,f1404]) ).
fof(f1404,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f11448,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f21,f6538]) ).
fof(f6538,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(resolution,[],[f1406,f18]) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
! [X3] : c_in(c_Pair(X3,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
fof(f1406,axiom,
! [X47] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X47,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X47,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f21,axiom,
! [X3,X6,X4,X5] :
( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X5),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X4,X6),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X5,X6,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : COL118-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 12:59:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (16776)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.39 % (16782)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (16777)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (16781)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.40 % (16783)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.41 % (16780)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.41 % (16778)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.41 % (16779)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.41 % (16779)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.49 TRYING [1]
% 0.22/0.50 TRYING [2]
% 1.51/0.61 TRYING [3]
% 1.95/0.68 TRYING [1]
% 1.95/0.70 TRYING [1]
% 1.95/0.71 TRYING [2]
% 2.44/0.72 TRYING [2]
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)First to succeed.
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-16776"
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.80/0.78 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 2.80/0.78 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)------------------------------
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.80/0.78
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Memory used [KB]: 8306
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Time elapsed: 0.392 s
% 2.80/0.78 % (16779)Instructions burned: 945 (million)
% 2.80/0.78 % (16776)Success in time 0.406 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------