TSTP Solution File: COL117-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : COL117-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.05s 1.29s
% Output : Refutation 1.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : COL117-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 10:13:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Tue May 31 10:13:40 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13184.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.36 in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 33
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.12/0.39 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.39 distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.39 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.59/0.77 Changing weight limit from 60 to 38.
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.59/0.77 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 55 givens.
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Changing weight limit from 38 to 34.
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.76/1.00 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 60 givens.
% 0.76/1.00
% 0.83/1.05
% 0.83/1.05
% 0.83/1.05 Changing weight limit from 34 to 30.
% 0.83/1.05
% 0.83/1.05 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 65 givens.
% 0.83/1.05
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.05/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.89 sec ----> 6509 [hyper,121,1,6] {-} $F.
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 2.
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.05/1.29 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 1 [] {+} -c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),A,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))| -c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),A,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 2 [] {+} -c_in(c_Pair(A,B,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))| -c_in(c_Pair(C,D,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))|c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(C,A),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(D,B),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 3 [] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 4 [] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 5 [] {-} c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 6 [] {-} c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,A),B),C),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(A,C),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(B,C)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 9 [hyper,4,2,3] {-} c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 13 [hyper,5,2,3] {-} c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 121 [hyper,13,2,9] {-} c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)).
% 1.05/1.29 6509 [hyper,121,1,6] {-} $F.
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.05/1.29 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 ============ end of search ============
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 1.05/1.29 false clauses given 134
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 FALSE TRUE
% 1.05/1.29 22 358 0
% 1.05/1.29 26 1248 0
% 1.05/1.29 30 962 0
% 1.05/1.29 tot: 2568 0 (0.0% true)
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.05/1.29
% 1.05/1.29 Process 13184 finished Tue May 31 10:13:41 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------