TSTP Solution File: COL117-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL117-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 8.17s 1.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_1454,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__3_0) ).
cnf(c_1455,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X3),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
cnf(c_25324,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1454,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_25333,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1455,c_25324]) ).
cnf(c_25348,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1455,c_25333]) ).
cnf(c_25371,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_25348,c_50,c_49,c_25348]) ).
cnf(c_25373,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1455,c_25371]) ).
cnf(c_25374,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_25373,c_49,c_51]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : COL117-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:13:19 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 8.17/1.63 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.17/1.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ iProver source info
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 8.17/1.63 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 8.17/1.63 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Parsing...successful
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 823 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Proving...
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Problem Properties
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 clauses 342
% 8.17/1.63 conjectures 4
% 8.17/1.63 EPR 27
% 8.17/1.63 Horn 301
% 8.17/1.63 unary 89
% 8.17/1.63 binary 191
% 8.17/1.63 lits 685
% 8.17/1.63 lits eq 219
% 8.17/1.63 fd_pure 0
% 8.17/1.63 fd_pseudo 0
% 8.17/1.63 fd_cond 23
% 8.17/1.63 fd_pseudo_cond 42
% 8.17/1.63 AC symbols 0
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------
% 8.17/1.63 Current options:
% 8.17/1.63 ------
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 ------ Proving...
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.17/1.63
% 8.17/1.63
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------