TSTP Solution File: COL115-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : COL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:09:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.76s 1.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x),v_ya),v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_1449,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).

cnf(c_1451,plain,
    c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__3_0) ).

cnf(c_29589,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_z)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1451,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_29598,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_29589,c_1449]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : COL115-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:53:05 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.76/1.68  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.76/1.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------  iProver source info
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 7.76/1.68  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 7.76/1.68  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Parsing...successful
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 823 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 69 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Proving...
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  clauses                                 339
% 7.76/1.68  conjectures                             1
% 7.76/1.68  EPR                                     27
% 7.76/1.68  Horn                                    298
% 7.76/1.68  unary                                   86
% 7.76/1.68  binary                                  191
% 7.76/1.68  lits                                    682
% 7.76/1.68  lits eq                                 219
% 7.76/1.68  fd_pure                                 0
% 7.76/1.68  fd_pseudo                               0
% 7.76/1.68  fd_cond                                 23
% 7.76/1.68  fd_pseudo_cond                          42
% 7.76/1.68  AC symbols                              0
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ 
% 7.76/1.68  Current options:
% 7.76/1.68  ------ 
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  ------ Proving...
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.76/1.68  
% 7.76/1.68  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------