TSTP Solution File: COL114-2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : COL114-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:22:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 5 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 11 ( 4 >; 7 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
v_x: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
v_x_H: $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
c_Pair: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
tc_prod: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
v_w: $i ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X1),X2),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,v_x_H),v_w),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X1),X2),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : COL114-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 03:57:12 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.60 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time : 0.003000 s
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------