TSTP Solution File: COL113-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : COL113-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:06:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 3 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X1] : c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13 % Problem : COL113-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.15 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:04:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (23139)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23140)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23145)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23142)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [1,1,max,1,max]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 % (23145)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38 Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 Detected maximum model sizes of [1,1,max,1,max]
% 0.15/0.38 % (23142)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1,1,1,1,1]
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1,1,2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-23139"
% 0.15/0.38 % (23140)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 % (23146)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23141)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)Memory used [KB]: 725
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 TRYING [1,1,2,1,2]
% 0.15/0.38 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23143)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)Memory used [KB]: 726
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23141)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23143)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Memory used [KB]: 728
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (23144)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (23139)Success in time 0.005 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------