TSTP Solution File: COL111-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL111-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.42s 1.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_y_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
cnf(c_62,plain,
tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
c_Pair(v_x,v_y_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_62]) ).
cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
c_in(sP1_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_173,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_y_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(sP1_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_64]) ).
cnf(c_174,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,v_y_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_65]) ).
cnf(c_175,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_62]) ).
cnf(c_176,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_174,c_175]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : COL111-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:28:13 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.42/1.22 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ iProver source info
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.42/1.22 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.42/1.22 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Proving...
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 clauses 5
% 1.42/1.22 conjectures 2
% 1.42/1.22 EPR 1
% 1.42/1.22 Horn 5
% 1.42/1.22 unary 4
% 1.42/1.22 binary 1
% 1.42/1.22 lits 6
% 1.42/1.22 lits eq 2
% 1.42/1.22 fd_pure 0
% 1.42/1.22 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.42/1.22 fd_cond 0
% 1.42/1.22 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.42/1.22 AC symbols 0
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------
% 1.42/1.22 Current options:
% 1.42/1.22 ------
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 ------ Proving...
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.42/1.22
% 1.42/1.22
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------