TSTP Solution File: COL111-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : COL111-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 04:45:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   2   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f4,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_y_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_y_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
      | ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1] : c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : COL111-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 18:28:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (23580)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (23581)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-23580"
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Memory used [KB]: 730
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (23585)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (23580)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------