TSTP Solution File: COL110-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : COL110-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:06:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 78 ( 45 ~; 31 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f52,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f37,f44,f51]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
~ spl0_6,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f50]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f49,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_wa,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
fof(f49,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_wa,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_wa,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_wa,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f45,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0] :
( c_in(c_Pair(X0,v_xaa(X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_8) ).
fof(f45,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_wa,v_xaa(X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) )
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f36,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0] :
( c_in(c_Pair(v_w,v_xaa(X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
fof(f36,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_w,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_wa,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) )
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
( spl0_6
<=> ! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_w,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_wa,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
~ spl0_5,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f42,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_yb,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f42,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_yb,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f41]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_yb,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_yb,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f38,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] :
( c_in(c_Pair(X0,v_xb(X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
fof(f38,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,v_xb(X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) )
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f33,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,v_xb(X0),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
fof(f33,plain,
( ! [X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) )
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
( spl0_5
<=> ! [X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
( spl0_5
| spl0_6 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f30,f35,f32]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_w,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_wa,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f20,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X1,X4] :
( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X3,X1),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X4,X2),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X3,X4,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
fof(f20,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_wa),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_w,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_ya,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_wa),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : COL110-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:10:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % (16013)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.38 % (16018)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16014)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16015)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16016)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16017)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16019)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16020)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (16016)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38 % (16019)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (16016)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-16013"
% 0.14/0.39 % (16016)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.39 % (16016)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (16016)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.39 % (16016)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (16016)Memory used [KB]: 769
% 0.22/0.39 % (16016)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (16016)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (16013)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------