TSTP Solution File: COL102-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : COL102-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:09:53 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.22s 1.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X4,X0,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | c_in(c_Pair(X4,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(c_172,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | c_in(X0,c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X1,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0) ).

cnf(c_1432,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-0.ax',cls_Comb_Ocontract_OAp1_0) ).

cnf(c_23822,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X4,X2,X2),X3,tc_prod(X2,X2))
    | c_in(c_Pair(X0,X4,X2,X2),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(X3,X2),tc_prod(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_23862,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
    | c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_23822]) ).

cnf(c_24044,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_23862,c_53]) ).

cnf(c_24840,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1432,c_24044]) ).

cnf(c_24841,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_24840]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COL102-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:46:18 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 8.22/1.65  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.22/1.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------  iProver source info
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 8.22/1.65  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 8.22/1.65  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Parsing...successful
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 823 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e 
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Proving...
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  clauses                                 322
% 8.22/1.65  conjectures                             4
% 8.22/1.65  EPR                                     27
% 8.22/1.65  Horn                                    287
% 8.22/1.65  unary                                   87
% 8.22/1.65  binary                                  179
% 8.22/1.65  lits                                    629
% 8.22/1.65  lits eq                                 194
% 8.22/1.65  fd_pure                                 0
% 8.22/1.65  fd_pseudo                               0
% 8.22/1.65  fd_cond                                 21
% 8.22/1.65  fd_pseudo_cond                          42
% 8.22/1.65  AC symbols                              0
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ 
% 8.22/1.65  Current options:
% 8.22/1.65  ------ 
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  ------ Proving...
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.22/1.65  
% 8.22/1.65  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------