TSTP Solution File: COL102-1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : COL102-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 17.50s 2.71s
% Output : Proof 17.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/MSC001-0.ax',cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/COL002-0.ax',cls_Comb_Ocontract_OAp1_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COL102-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 08:08:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 17.50/2.71 % symbols: 218
% 17.50/2.71 % clauses: 1580
% 17.50/2.71 % start clauses: 4
% 17.50/2.71 % iterative deepening steps: 2422
% 17.50/2.71 % maximum path limit: 3
% 17.50/2.71 % literal attempts: 4794814
% 17.50/2.71 % depth failures: 4244234
% 17.50/2.71 % regularity failures: 78817
% 17.50/2.71 % tautology failures: 115122
% 17.50/2.71 % reductions: 225544
% 17.50/2.71 % extensions: 4565013
% 17.50/2.71 % SAT variables: 416968
% 17.50/2.71 % SAT clauses: 419322
% 17.50/2.71 % WalkSAT solutions: 419318
% 17.50/2.71 % CDCL solutions: 2
% 17.50/2.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 17.50/2.71 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------