TSTP Solution File: COL091-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL091-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 106.15s 14.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 106.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 6 unt; 11 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 57 ( 22 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_192,plain,
comb_app(X0,X1) != combK,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_app) ).
cnf(c_205,plain,
( ~ member(pair(comb_app(X0,X1),X2),contract)
| ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2)
| ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2)
| ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2)
| ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE1) ).
cnf(c_208,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2)
| comb_app(combK,X2) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE4) ).
cnf(c_213,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2)
| comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(X0,X1,X2)),ap_contractE_sk1q(X0,X1,X2)) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE9) ).
cnf(c_214,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2)
| member(pair(X0,ap_contractE_sk2q(X0,X1,X2)),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE10) ).
cnf(c_217,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2)
| member(pair(X1,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE13) ).
cnf(c_219,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2)
| comb_app(X0,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE15) ).
cnf(c_220,plain,
~ member(pair(combK,X0),contract),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_contractE) ).
cnf(c_222,plain,
member(pair(comb_app(combK,p),r),contract),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_h1) ).
cnf(c_223,negated_conjecture,
( comb_app(combK,X0) != r
| ~ member(pair(p,X0),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_c1) ).
cnf(c_6267,plain,
~ ap_contractE_c3(combK,X0,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_214,c_220]) ).
cnf(c_6279,plain,
( ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_222,c_205]) ).
cnf(c_6284,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6279,c_219]) ).
cnf(c_6288,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6284,c_6267]) ).
cnf(c_6305,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6288,c_208]) ).
cnf(c_6319,plain,
( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(combK,p,r)),ap_contractE_sk1q(combK,p,r)) = combK
| comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6305,c_213]) ).
cnf(c_6363,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6319,c_192]) ).
cnf(c_6386,plain,
( ~ member(pair(p,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)),contract)
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6363,c_223]) ).
cnf(c_6418,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r)
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_6386]) ).
cnf(c_6419,plain,
( comb_app(combK,r) = combK
| ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6279,c_6418]) ).
cnf(c_6428,plain,
( comb_app(combK,r) = combK
| ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6419,c_6267]) ).
cnf(c_6431,plain,
( comb_app(combK,r) = combK
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6428,c_208]) ).
cnf(c_6435,plain,
( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(combK,p,r)),ap_contractE_sk1q(combK,p,r)) = combK
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6431,c_213]) ).
cnf(c_6450,plain,
comb_app(combK,r) = combK,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6435,c_192]) ).
cnf(c_6465,plain,
$false,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6450,c_192]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : COL091-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:22:04 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 106.15/14.74 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 106.15/14.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ iProver source info
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 106.15/14.74 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 106.15/14.74 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Parsing...successful
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 16 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 4 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Proving...
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Problem Properties
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 clauses 147
% 106.15/14.74 conjectures 1
% 106.15/14.74 EPR 14
% 106.15/14.74 Horn 122
% 106.15/14.74 unary 19
% 106.15/14.74 binary 89
% 106.15/14.74 lits 319
% 106.15/14.74 lits eq 56
% 106.15/14.74 fd_pure 0
% 106.15/14.74 fd_pseudo 0
% 106.15/14.74 fd_cond 0
% 106.15/14.74 fd_pseudo_cond 19
% 106.15/14.74 AC symbols 0
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------
% 106.15/14.74 Current options:
% 106.15/14.74 ------
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Proving...
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Proving...
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 ------ Proving...
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 106.15/14.74
% 106.15/14.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 106.15/14.75
% 106.15/14.75
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------