TSTP Solution File: COL091-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL091-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.45s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 10 unt; 9 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 15 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_50,plain,
comb_app(X0,X1) != combK,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_app) ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
( ~ member(pair(comb_app(X0,X1),X2),contract)
| ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2)
| ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2)
| ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2)
| ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE1) ).
cnf(c_66,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c1(X0,X1,X2)
| comb_app(combK,X2) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE4) ).
cnf(c_71,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c2(X0,X1,X2)
| comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(X0,X1,X2)),ap_contractE_sk1q(X0,X1,X2)) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE9) ).
cnf(c_72,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c3(X0,X1,X2)
| member(pair(X0,ap_contractE_sk2q(X0,X1,X2)),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE10) ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2)
| member(pair(X1,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE13) ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
( ~ ap_contractE_c4(X0,X1,X2)
| comb_app(X0,ap_contractE_sk3q(X0,X1,X2)) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE15) ).
cnf(c_78,plain,
~ member(pair(combK,X0),contract),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_contractE) ).
cnf(c_80,plain,
member(pair(comb_app(combK,p),r),contract),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_h1) ).
cnf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
( comb_app(combK,X0) != r
| ~ member(pair(p,X0),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_c1) ).
cnf(c_1185,negated_conjecture,
( comb_app(combK,X0) != r
| ~ member(pair(p,X0),contract) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).
cnf(c_1583,plain,
~ ap_contractE_c3(combK,X0,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_1630,plain,
( ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_1631,plain,
( ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1630,c_1583]) ).
cnf(c_1660,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1631,c_77]) ).
cnf(c_1671,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| comb_app(combK,r) = combK
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1660,c_66]) ).
cnf(c_1680,plain,
( comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1671,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_1690,plain,
( comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(combK,p,r)),ap_contractE_sk1q(combK,p,r)) = combK
| comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1680,c_71]) ).
cnf(c_1694,plain,
comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)) = r,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1690,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_1706,plain,
~ member(pair(p,ap_contractE_sk3q(combK,p,r)),contract),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1694,c_1185]) ).
cnf(c_1728,plain,
~ ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_1706]) ).
cnf(c_1729,plain,
( ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r)
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1631,c_1728]) ).
cnf(c_1736,plain,
( comb_app(combK,r) = combK
| ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1729,c_66]) ).
cnf(c_1743,plain,
ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1736,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_1774,plain,
comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(combK,p,r)),ap_contractE_sk1q(combK,p,r)) = combK,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1743,c_71]) ).
cnf(c_1776,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1774,c_50]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COL091-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:26:14 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.45/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.45/1.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.45/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 clauses 32
% 3.45/1.14 conjectures 1
% 3.45/1.14 EPR 8
% 3.45/1.14 Horn 31
% 3.45/1.14 unary 8
% 3.45/1.14 binary 20
% 3.45/1.14 lits 63
% 3.45/1.14 lits eq 13
% 3.45/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 3.45/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.45/1.14 fd_cond 0
% 3.45/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 3.45/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------
% 3.45/1.14 Current options:
% 3.45/1.14 ------
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.45/1.14
% 3.45/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------