TSTP Solution File: COL089-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : COL089-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:02:29 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 22.28s 3.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 22.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 75 ( 0 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 55 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(reduction_rls_4,axiom,
( member(pair(comb_app(X3,X1),X4),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X1,X2),contract)
| ~ member(X3,comb)
| ~ member(pair(comb_app(X3,X2),X4),rtrancl(contract)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_rls_4) ).
cnf(reduction_refl,axiom,
( member(pair(X1,X1),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(X1,comb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_refl) ).
cnf(ap_E1,axiom,
( member(X1,comb)
| ~ member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_E1) ).
cnf(transD,axiom,
( member(pair(X2,X4),X1)
| ~ trans(X1)
| ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X1)
| ~ member(pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transD) ).
cnf(trans_rtrancl,axiom,
trans(rtrancl(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_rtrancl) ).
cnf(ap_reduce2_2c1,negated_conjecture,
~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2c1) ).
cnf(ap_reduce2_2h5,hypothesis,
member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,y)),rtrancl(contract)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h5) ).
cnf(contract_combD2,axiom,
( member(X2,comb)
| ~ member(pair(X1,X2),contract) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contract_combD2) ).
cnf(ap_reduce2_2h4,hypothesis,
member(pair(y,z),contract),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h4) ).
cnf(comb_intros3,axiom,
( member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb)
| ~ member(X1,comb)
| ~ member(X2,comb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comb_intros3) ).
cnf(ap_reduce2_2h1,hypothesis,
member(r,comb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h1) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( member(pair(comb_app(X3,X1),X4),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X1,X2),contract)
| ~ member(X3,comb)
| ~ member(pair(comb_app(X3,X2),X4),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reduction_rls_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( member(pair(X1,X1),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(X1,comb) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reduction_refl]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( member(X1,comb)
| ~ member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ap_E1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( member(pair(X2,X4),X1)
| ~ trans(X1)
| ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X1)
| ~ member(pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transD]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( member(pair(comb_app(X3,X1),X4),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X1,X2),contract)
| ~ member(X3,comb)
| ~ member(pair(comb_app(X3,X2),X4),rtrancl(contract)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( member(pair(X1,X1),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(X1,comb) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( member(X1,comb)
| ~ member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( member(pair(X2,X4),X1)
| ~ trans(X1)
| ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X1)
| ~ member(pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( member(pair(comb_app(X1,X2),comb_app(X1,X3)),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X2,X3),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X1,X3),comb) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
trans(rtrancl(X1)),
trans_rtrancl ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ap_reduce2_2c1]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( member(pair(X1,comb_app(X2,X3)),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X1,comb_app(X2,X4)),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X4,X3),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X2,X3),comb) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,y)),rtrancl(contract)),
ap_reduce2_2h5 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( member(X2,comb)
| ~ member(pair(X1,X2),contract) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[contract_combD2]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,X1)),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(y,X1),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(r,X1),comb) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
member(pair(y,z),contract),
ap_reduce2_2h4 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb)
| ~ member(X1,comb)
| ~ member(X2,comb) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[comb_intros3]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( member(X2,comb)
| ~ member(pair(X1,X2),contract) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ member(comb_app(r,z),comb),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb)
| ~ member(X1,comb)
| ~ member(X2,comb) ),
c_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
member(z,comb),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
member(r,comb),
ap_reduce2_2h1 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COL089-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:19:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 22.28/3.34 # Version: 3.1.0
% 22.28/3.34 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 22.28/3.34 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # sh5l with pid 17025 completed with status 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Result found by sh5l
% 22.28/3.34 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 22.28/3.34 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 22.28/3.34 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 22.28/3.34 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17030 completed with status 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 22.28/3.34 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 22.28/3.34 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 22.28/3.34 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 22.28/3.34 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 22.28/3.34 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 22.28/3.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 22.28/3.34 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 22.28/3.34
% 22.28/3.34 # Proof found!
% 22.28/3.34 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 22.28/3.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 22.28/3.34 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 22.28/3.34 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Initial clauses : 44
% 22.28/3.34 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 22.28/3.34 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 22.28/3.34 # Processed clauses : 8456
% 22.28/3.34 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # ...subsumed : 4667
% 22.28/3.34 # ...remaining for further processing : 3789
% 22.28/3.34 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 136
% 22.28/3.34 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Backward-subsumed : 248
% 22.28/3.34 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Generated clauses : 103921
% 22.28/3.34 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 102669
% 22.28/3.34 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 325
% 22.28/3.34 # Paramodulations : 103780
% 22.28/3.34 # Factorizations : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # NegExts : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Equation resolutions : 141
% 22.28/3.34 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Total rewrite steps : 3296
% 22.28/3.34 # ...of those cached : 3287
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional check models : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 22.28/3.34 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 22.28/3.34 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 22.28/3.34 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 22.28/3.34 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 22.28/3.34 # Current number of processed clauses : 3498
% 22.28/3.34 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 22.28/3.34 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Negative unit clauses : 71
% 22.28/3.34 # Non-unit-clauses : 3418
% 22.28/3.34 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94176
% 22.28/3.34 # ...number of literals in the above : 523734
% 22.28/3.34 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Current number of archived clauses : 291
% 22.28/3.34 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4891915
% 22.28/3.34 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 689121
% 22.28/3.34 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4192
% 22.28/3.34 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17476
% 22.28/3.34 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 22.28/3.34 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Condensation successes : 0
% 22.28/3.34 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2314284
% 22.28/3.34 # Search garbage collected termcells : 90
% 22.28/3.34
% 22.28/3.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 22.28/3.34 # User time : 2.714 s
% 22.28/3.34 # System time : 0.066 s
% 22.28/3.34 # Total time : 2.781 s
% 22.28/3.34 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 22.28/3.34
% 22.28/3.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 22.28/3.34 # User time : 2.718 s
% 22.28/3.34 # System time : 0.067 s
% 22.28/3.34 # Total time : 2.785 s
% 22.28/3.34 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 22.28/3.34 % E---3.1 exiting
% 22.28/3.34 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------