TSTP Solution File: COL088-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL088-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 110.28s 15.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 110.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 1 equ; 40 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_201,plain,
( ~ member(X0,comb)
| ~ member(X1,comb)
| member(comb_app(X0,X1),comb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comb_intros3) ).
cnf(c_202,plain,
( ~ member(X0,comb)
| member(pair(X0,X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_refl) ).
cnf(c_222,plain,
( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),X2)
| ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X2)
| ~ trans(X2)
| member(pair(X0,X3),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transD) ).
cnf(c_223,plain,
trans(rtrancl(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_rtrancl) ).
cnf(c_224,plain,
( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract)
| member(X1,comb) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contract_combD2) ).
cnf(c_227,plain,
( ~ member(pair(comb_app(X0,X1),X2),rtrancl(contract))
| ~ member(pair(X3,X0),contract)
| ~ member(X1,comb)
| member(pair(comb_app(X3,X1),X2),rtrancl(contract)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_rls_3) ).
cnf(c_229,plain,
member(r,comb),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce1_2h1) ).
cnf(c_232,plain,
member(pair(y,z),contract),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce1_2h4) ).
cnf(c_233,plain,
member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(y,r)),rtrancl(contract)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce1_2h5) ).
cnf(c_234,negated_conjecture,
~ member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(z,r)),rtrancl(contract)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce1_2c1) ).
cnf(c_1806,plain,
( rtrancl(X0) != X1
| ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X1)
| ~ member(pair(X3,X4),X1)
| member(pair(X2,X4),X1) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_222,c_223]) ).
cnf(c_1807,plain,
( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),rtrancl(X2))
| ~ member(pair(X1,X3),rtrancl(X2))
| member(pair(X0,X3),rtrancl(X2)) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1806]) ).
cnf(c_6447,plain,
( ~ member(pair(comb_app(y,r),X0),rtrancl(contract))
| member(pair(comb_app(p,r),X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_233,c_1807]) ).
cnf(c_6464,plain,
( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb)
| ~ member(X2,comb)
| member(pair(comb_app(X0,X2),comb_app(X1,X2)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_227]) ).
cnf(c_6569,plain,
( ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X0,r),comb)
| ~ member(r,comb)
| member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(X0,r)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6464,c_6447]) ).
cnf(c_6814,plain,
member(z,comb),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_232,c_224]) ).
cnf(c_6827,plain,
( ~ member(pair(comb_app(y,r),X0),rtrancl(contract))
| member(pair(comb_app(p,r),X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_233,c_1807]) ).
cnf(c_6836,plain,
( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X1,X2),comb)
| ~ member(X2,comb)
| member(pair(comb_app(X0,X2),comb_app(X1,X2)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_227]) ).
cnf(c_6842,plain,
( ~ member(X0,comb)
| ~ member(r,comb)
| member(comb_app(X0,r),comb) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_201]) ).
cnf(c_6868,plain,
( ~ member(r,comb)
| ~ member(z,comb)
| member(comb_app(z,r),comb) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_6842]) ).
cnf(c_6921,plain,
( ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X0,r),comb)
| ~ member(r,comb)
| member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(X0,r)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6836,c_6827]) ).
cnf(c_7281,plain,
( ~ member(comb_app(X0,r),comb)
| ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract)
| member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(X0,r)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_6921,c_229,c_6569]) ).
cnf(c_7282,plain,
( ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(X0,r),comb)
| member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(X0,r)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_7281]) ).
cnf(c_7286,plain,
( ~ member(pair(y,z),contract)
| ~ member(comb_app(z,r),comb) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7282,c_234]) ).
cnf(c_7288,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_7286,c_6868,c_6814,c_232,c_229]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : COL088-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:22:26 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 110.28/15.23 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 110.28/15.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ iProver source info
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 110.28/15.23 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 110.28/15.23 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Parsing...successful
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 16 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 5 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Proving...
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Problem Properties
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 clauses 155
% 110.28/15.23 conjectures 1
% 110.28/15.23 EPR 14
% 110.28/15.23 Horn 129
% 110.28/15.23 unary 24
% 110.28/15.23 binary 86
% 110.28/15.23 lits 341
% 110.28/15.23 lits eq 55
% 110.28/15.23 fd_pure 0
% 110.28/15.23 fd_pseudo 0
% 110.28/15.23 fd_cond 0
% 110.28/15.23 fd_pseudo_cond 19
% 110.28/15.23 AC symbols 0
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------
% 110.28/15.23 Current options:
% 110.28/15.23 ------
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Proving...
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 ------ Proving...
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 110.28/15.23
% 110.28/15.23
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------