TSTP Solution File: COL079-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL079-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.19s 2.38s
% Output   : Refutation 2.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (  11 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(k_definition,axiom,
    apply(k(X),Y) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_definition) ).

cnf(abstraction,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y),Z) = apply(apply(X,k(Z)),apply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstraction) ).

cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
    ( X = Y
    | apply(X,n(X,Y)) != apply(Y,n(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality2) ).

cnf(prove_TRC2a,negated_conjecture,
    apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_TRC2a) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    apply(apply(abstraction,b),n(apply(abstraction,b),apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))))) != apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))),n(apply(abstraction,b),apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[extensionality2,prove_TRC2a]) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),k(Y)),Z) = apply(apply(X,k(Z)),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[abstraction,k_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X)),Y),Z) = apply(apply(X,k(apply(Y,Z))),Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[abstraction,abstraction,theory(equality)]),k_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(162,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X))),Y),Z) = apply(apply(X,k(Z)),apply(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[10,12,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1317,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y),Z) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X))),Y),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[abstraction,162,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1348,plain,
    apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y) = apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X))),Y),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[extensionality2,1317]) ).

cnf(1349,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,1348,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COL079-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 14:38:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T14:38:56
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T14:38:56
% 2.19/2.38  
% 2.19/2.38  
% 2.19/2.38  #||
% 2.19/2.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/2.38  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.19/2.39  ||#
% 2.19/2.39  
% 2.19/2.39  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.19/2.39  ;      3385 formulas have been input or derived (from 54 formulas).
% 2.19/2.39  ;      1349 (40%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.19/2.39  ;           90 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.19/2.39  ;         1259 (93%) are still being kept.
% 2.19/2.39  ; 
% 2.19/2.39  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.002   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (4 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.201  10%   Process new row              (3,115 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.016   1%   Resolution                   (106 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.060   3%   Paramodulation               (53 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.001   0%   Condensing                   (95 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.007   0%   Forward subsumption          (95 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.003   0%   Backward subsumption         (63 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.009   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (264 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.431  23%   Forward simplification       (2,744 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.101   5%   Backward simplification      (1,349 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1.049  55%   Ordering                     (124,963 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     0.035   2%   Other
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1.915        Total
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1.917        Real time
% 2.19/2.39  ; 
% 2.19/2.39  ; Term-hash-array has 5,412 terms in all.
% 2.19/2.39  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 63 entries (63 at peak, 63 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.19/2.39  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 486 nodes (486 at peak, 486 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.19/2.39  ;  Retrieved 234 possibly forward subsuming rows in 95 calls.
% 2.19/2.39  ;  Retrieved 50 possibly backward subsumed rows in 63 calls.
% 2.19/2.39  ; Path-index has 5,132 entries (5,181 at peak, 5,441 added, 309 deleted).
% 2.19/2.39  ; Path-index has 3,948 nodes (4,010 at peak, 4,020 added, 72 deleted).
% 2.19/2.39  ; Trie-index has 5,132 entries (5,181 at peak, 5,441 added, 309 deleted).
% 2.19/2.39  ; Trie-index has 32,242 nodes (32,641 at peak, 34,095 added, 1,853 deleted).
% 2.19/2.39  ; Retrieved 115,437 generalization terms in 37,028 calls.
% 2.19/2.39  ; Retrieved 22,480 instance terms in 3,359 calls.
% 2.19/2.39  ; Retrieved 24,918 unifiable terms in 648 calls.
% 2.19/2.39  ; 
% 2.19/2.39  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 1 entry:
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1 with value 0
% 2.19/2.39  ; The agenda of rows to process has 69 entries:
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1 with value 25              3 with value 36               3 with value 45
% 2.19/2.39  ;     2 with value 27              2 with value 37               2 with value 46
% 2.19/2.39  ;     2 with value 28              4 with value 38               1 with value 47
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1 with value 29              7 with value 39               2 with value 48
% 2.19/2.39  ;     2 with value 31              2 with value 40               1 with value 49
% 2.19/2.39  ;     2 with value 32              4 with value 41               2 with value 50
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1 with value 33              6 with value 42               3 with value 51
% 2.19/2.39  ;     2 with value 34              4 with value 43               2 with value 52
% 2.19/2.39  ;     2 with value 35              4 with value 44               2 with value 58
% 2.19/2.39  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1215 entries:
% 2.19/2.39  ;     1 with value (4 24)         95 with value (4 39)          26 with value (4 50)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    14 with value (4 29)         86 with value (4 40)          19 with value (4 51)
% 2.19/2.39  ;     9 with value (4 30)         89 with value (4 41)          14 with value (4 52)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    28 with value (4 31)         84 with value (4 42)           3 with value (4 53)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    32 with value (4 32)         81 with value (4 43)           7 with value (4 54)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    37 with value (4 33)         74 with value (4 44)           5 with value (4 55)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    49 with value (4 34)         54 with value (4 45)           2 with value (4 56)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    50 with value (4 35)         39 with value (4 46)           5 with value (4 60)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    72 with value (4 36)         29 with value (4 47)           3 with value (4 62)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    57 with value (4 37)         32 with value (4 48)           1 with value (4 63)
% 2.19/2.39  ;    96 with value (4 38)         20 with value (4 49)           2 with value (4 67)
% 2.19/2.39  Evaluation took:
% 2.19/2.39    1.917 seconds of real time
% 2.19/2.39    1.73406 seconds of user run time
% 2.19/2.39    0.183155 seconds of system run time
% 2.19/2.39    [Run times include 0.112 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.19/2.39    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.19/2.39    0 page faults and
% 2.19/2.39    120,164,776 bytes consed.
% 2.19/2.39  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.19/2.39  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T14:38:58
% 2.19/2.39  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.19/2.39  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------