TSTP Solution File: COL079-2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : COL079-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:03:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 29.73s 4.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 29.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 32 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 53 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality2) ).
cnf(k_definition,axiom,
apply(k(X1),X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_definition) ).
cnf(abstraction,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstraction) ).
cnf(prove_TRC2a,negated_conjecture,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_TRC2a) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( X1 = X2
| apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[extensionality2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( X1 = X2
| apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
apply(k(X1),X2) = X1,
k_definition ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),apply(X2,X3)),
abstraction ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( k(X1) = X2
| apply(X2,n(k(X1),X2)) != X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,k(X1)),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( k(X1) = apply(apply(abstraction,k(X2)),X3)
| apply(X2,apply(X3,n(k(X1),apply(apply(abstraction,k(X2)),X3)))) != X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
apply(apply(abstraction,k(k(X1))),X2) = k(X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
apply(abstraction,k(k(X1))) = k(k(X1)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),X1),k(X2)) = k(X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
apply(apply(X1,k(apply(X2,X3))),apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X4),X2),X3)) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),apply(X4,k(X3))),apply(X2,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),X1)),X2),X3) = X3,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),k(X2)),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
apply(apply(X1,k(apply(X2,X3))),X3) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1)),X2),X3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2) = X3
| apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),n(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2),X3)) != apply(X3,n(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2),X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2) = apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_TRC2a]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))) = X2
| apply(apply(abstraction,X1),n(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2)) != apply(X2,n(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))) = apply(abstraction,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : COL079-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:21:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.73/4.26 # Version: 3.1.0
% 29.73/4.26 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 29.73/4.26 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 20415 completed with status 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 29.73/4.26 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 29.73/4.26 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # No SInE strategy applied
% 29.73/4.26 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 29.73/4.26 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting U----_211g_01_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # U----_211g_01_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 20419 completed with status 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Result found by U----_211g_01_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 29.73/4.26 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 29.73/4.26 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # No SInE strategy applied
% 29.73/4.26 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 29.73/4.26 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 29.73/4.26 # Starting U----_211g_01_C07_19_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 29.73/4.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 29.73/4.26 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 29.73/4.26
% 29.73/4.26 # Proof found!
% 29.73/4.26 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 29.73/4.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 29.73/4.26 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 29.73/4.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Initial clauses : 4
% 29.73/4.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 29.73/4.26 # Processed clauses : 4225
% 29.73/4.26 # ...of these trivial : 385
% 29.73/4.26 # ...subsumed : 3034
% 29.73/4.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 806
% 29.73/4.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3530
% 29.73/4.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Backward-subsumed : 8
% 29.73/4.26 # Backward-rewritten : 147
% 29.73/4.26 # Generated clauses : 121736
% 29.73/4.26 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 106510
% 29.73/4.26 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Paramodulations : 118196
% 29.73/4.26 # Factorizations : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # NegExts : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Equation resolutions : 3540
% 29.73/4.26 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Total rewrite steps : 169906
% 29.73/4.26 # ...of those cached : 142834
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional check models : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 29.73/4.26 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 29.73/4.26 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 29.73/4.26 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 29.73/4.26 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 29.73/4.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 580
% 29.73/4.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 442
% 29.73/4.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 49
% 29.73/4.26 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 89
% 29.73/4.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 101346
% 29.73/4.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 123854
% 29.73/4.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 159
% 29.73/4.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7408
% 29.73/4.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7194
% 29.73/4.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2661
% 29.73/4.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1146
% 29.73/4.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 48180
% 29.73/4.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 317
% 29.73/4.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 29.73/4.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5715221
% 29.73/4.26 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 29.73/4.26
% 29.73/4.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 29.73/4.26 # User time : 3.559 s
% 29.73/4.26 # System time : 0.131 s
% 29.73/4.26 # Total time : 3.690 s
% 29.73/4.26 # Maximum resident set size: 1580 pages
% 29.73/4.26
% 29.73/4.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 29.73/4.26 # User time : 18.067 s
% 29.73/4.26 # System time : 0.275 s
% 29.73/4.26 # Total time : 18.342 s
% 29.73/4.26 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 29.73/4.26 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------