TSTP Solution File: COL075-2 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : COL075-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:36:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   52 (  51 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(k_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(k,X),Y) = X ).

cnf(abstraction,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y),Z) = apply(apply(X,apply(k,Z)),apply(Y,Z)) ).

cnf(prove_diagonal_combinator,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(Y,b(Y)),c(Y)) != apply(b(Y),b(Y)) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) != apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),
    inference(subst,[],[prove_diagonal_combinator:[bind(Y,$fot(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7) = apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),apply(apply(k,X),X_7)),
    inference(subst,[],[abstraction:[bind(X,$fot(X_5)),bind(Y,$fot(apply(k,X))),bind(Z,$fot(X_7))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    apply(apply(k,X),X_7) = X,
    inference(subst,[],[k_definition:[bind(Y,$fot(X_7))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7) != apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),apply(apply(k,X),X_7))
    | apply(apply(k,X),X_7) != X
    | apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7) = apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),X) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7),apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),apply(apply(k,X),X_7))) ),[1,1],$fot(X)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7) != apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),apply(apply(k,X),X_7))
    | apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7) = apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),X) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(k,X),X_7),X) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7) = apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),X),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X_5),apply(k,X)),X_7),apply(apply(X_5,apply(k,X_7)),apply(apply(k,X),X_7))) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),X_12) = apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X,$fot(X_10)),bind(X_5,$fot(apply(k,X_10))),bind(X_7,$fot(X_12))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10) = apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),
    inference(subst,[],[abstraction:[bind(X,$fot(abstraction)),bind(Y,$fot(k)),bind(Z,$fot(X_10))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10) != apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10))
    | apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_10:[bind(X0,$fot(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10))),bind(Y0,$fot(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10))) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),X_12) != apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)
    | apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)) != apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10)
    | apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) = apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),X_12),apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)) ),[0,0],$fot(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),X_12) != apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)
    | apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) = apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10)) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) = apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(k,X_10)),apply(k,X_10)),X_12),apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)) = X_10,
    inference(subst,[],[k_definition:[bind(X,$fot(X_10)),bind(Y,$fot(apply(k,X_12)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) = apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) != apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)
    | apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)) != X_10
    | apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) = apply(X_10,X_10) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10),apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)) ),[1,0],$fot(X_10)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)) != X_10
    | apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) = apply(X_10,X_10) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10),apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_18]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) = apply(X_10,X_10),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) != apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)
    | apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10) != apply(X_10,X_10)
    | apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) = apply(X_10,X_10) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12),apply(X_10,X_10)) ),[0],$fot(apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) != apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)
    | apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) = apply(X_10,X_10) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10),apply(X_10,X_10)) )],[refute_0_20,refute_0_21]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12) = apply(X_10,X_10),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),X_10),X_12),apply(apply(apply(k,X_10),apply(k,X_12)),X_10)) )],[refute_0_15,refute_0_22]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) = apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_23:[bind(X_10,$fot(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))),bind(X_12,$fot(c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    ( apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) != apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))
    | apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) != apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))
    | apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) = apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))) ),[0],$fot(apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    ( apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) != apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))
    | apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) = apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))) )],[refute_0_24,refute_0_25]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) != apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),c(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))) )],[refute_0_26,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))) = apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k))),apply(b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)),b(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k)))) )],[refute_0_28,refute_0_27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : COL075-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 12:33:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------